Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations LittleInch on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

MAWP and thickness tolerances 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jaburantos

Mechanical
Aug 23, 2021
2
Dear all,

I'd like your insight regarding MAWP / wall thickness for pressure vessel and how it should be calculated correctly. Let's say in a hypothetical case, with 0 corrosion allowance, from UG-27, I have calculated required thickness of the shell to be 10 mm. I then ordered plates with nominal thickness of 10 mm. UG-16(c)(2) allows me to use of any plate with actual thickness of 9.7 mm.
For MAWP, knowing that there is a plate with actual thickness of 9.7 mm, do I use 10 mm or 9.7 mm for calculation?
The same question for UG-79(d)(3). Say that for 10 mm required thickness, I ordered plates with nominal thickness of, say, 11 mm. After forming, I found that the thickness is reduced to 10.2 mm near the weld which should still satisfies UG-79(d) point 2 and 3. Which thickness do I use for MAWP, 11 mm or 10.2?
The way I read them, these clauses make it seems like these tolerances are "bonuses", so you can accept / use it and it doesn't have to affect the calculation. I have my doubt because for pipe, UG-16(d) makes it clear that I have to consider mill under tolerance, while for plates, at least for me, not so much.
I'm new to ASME VIII Div.1, so I apologize if the answer is obvious.
Thank you for your help.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

david339933
Thanks David!

I'm sure, virtually nobody would not risk choosing nominal thickness that close to their design thickness, not to mention other loads the vessel has to withstand. But knowing this really scratch my itch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor