Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

MAX. PENETRATION, MAX. CONTACT FORCE ERROR and NEGATIVE EIGENVALUES

Status
Not open for further replies.

MarceloM

Mechanical
Sep 10, 2018
53
Hello,

I'm doing a simulation in abaqus standard and i wont to know if MAX. PENETRATION, MAX. CONTACT FORCE ERROR and NEGATIVE EIGENVALUES is a problem or i can stay with them? If yes, how can i fix them and how they afect my results.

Some exemples:
"***WARNING: THE SYSTEM MATRIX HAS 23 NEGATIVE EIGENVALUES."

"MAX. PENETRATION ERROR 2.51836E-09 AT NODE SUPORTEPE-31-1.904 OF CONTACT
PAIR (ASSEMBLY_S_SURF-822,ASSEMBLY_M_SURF-849)
MAX. CONTACT FORCE ERROR -77.7828E-06 AT NODE SUPORTEPE-32-1.379 OF CONTACT
PAIR (ASSEMBLY_S_SURF-701,ASSEMBLY_M_SURF-704)
THE ESTIMATED CONTACT FORCE ERROR IS OUTSIDE OF CONVERGENCE TOLERANCES."

"MAX. PENETRATION ERROR 40.3043E-09 AT NODE SUPORTEPE-25-1.20 OF CONTACT
PAIR (ASSEMBLY_S_SURF-829,ASSEMBLY_M_SURF-828)
MAX. CONTACT FORCE ERROR 794.025E-06 AT NODE SUPORTEPE-23-1.10226 OF
CONTACT PAIR (ASSEMBLY_S_SURF-572,ASSEMBLY_M_SURF-842)
PENETRATION ERROR TOO LARGE COMPARED TO DISPLACEMENT INCREMENT."

Thank you.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

If the analysis find convergence in later iterations and the results look plausible, then you don't have to worry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor