originator
Industrial
- Dec 12, 2004
- 71
I am using a belt driven actuator to move an object clamped to the belt. The motor used is a servo with a controller and no means of outputting torque being applied. Here are my options so far to sense pressure and output a pulse to trigger a stop, reverse, or whatever else. The sensor need only work in one direction, not both. This is a safety application to stop the movement on a set amount of pressure exerted on the actuator.
1. A spring loaded idling tensioner on the belt with limit switch mounted so that the tensioner will hit the switch with X amount of torque being applied in one direction only.
**I don't have room for this method
2. A laser fixed near the object being moved. A reflector being attached to the mechanism used for the attachment or the belt to the object, so that on X pressure, the reflector will tilt and cause the laser to not direct the beam back to a receiver, causing the receiver to output a pulse.
**A lot of hassle to implement, calibrate etc
3. A physical switch mounted on the mechanism used for mounting the belt to the object. On X pressure, the springloaded mechanism moves towards the switch.
**A two conductor cable is require to travel back and forth mny times following the object. High probabilty of failure after many movements.
4. baterry operated switch, no cables required
**Access is very limited, if at all, once installed, so changing batteries is not a good option. Assuming there is a battery that will retain it's voltage for 20 years+ when not being used, this may be be a last resort. The switch could turn on the circuit and would very rarely be used if at all. If using a baterry operated "remote", what then is the easiest and most reliable method for trasmission: This is my most likely option, assumoing I can place a battery compartment where it can be replaced every year. A 9 Volt style case being the easiest to implement.
1. radio
2. infrared light(Infrared LED aimed at a receiver) which turns on a receiver
3. ?
Note : Using the object for a conductor for part of the siganl is not an option
Thanks for any tips
1. A spring loaded idling tensioner on the belt with limit switch mounted so that the tensioner will hit the switch with X amount of torque being applied in one direction only.
**I don't have room for this method
2. A laser fixed near the object being moved. A reflector being attached to the mechanism used for the attachment or the belt to the object, so that on X pressure, the reflector will tilt and cause the laser to not direct the beam back to a receiver, causing the receiver to output a pulse.
**A lot of hassle to implement, calibrate etc
3. A physical switch mounted on the mechanism used for mounting the belt to the object. On X pressure, the springloaded mechanism moves towards the switch.
**A two conductor cable is require to travel back and forth mny times following the object. High probabilty of failure after many movements.
4. baterry operated switch, no cables required
**Access is very limited, if at all, once installed, so changing batteries is not a good option. Assuming there is a battery that will retain it's voltage for 20 years+ when not being used, this may be be a last resort. The switch could turn on the circuit and would very rarely be used if at all. If using a baterry operated "remote", what then is the easiest and most reliable method for trasmission: This is my most likely option, assumoing I can place a battery compartment where it can be replaced every year. A 9 Volt style case being the easiest to implement.
1. radio
2. infrared light(Infrared LED aimed at a receiver) which turns on a receiver
3. ?
Note : Using the object for a conductor for part of the siganl is not an option
Thanks for any tips