spongebob007
Military
- Sep 14, 2007
- 265
I have always modeled bolted supports using fixed boundary conditions. For example, lets say I want to do an FEA model of a cantilever beam type structure that is bolted to the wall. I would start by using beam elements and fixing the end that is attached to the wall.
Recently I wrote a structural analysis report for a structure that is bolted to the floor. At the locations where the bolt holes are I applied fixed boundary conditions. The engineer who reviewed the report for the customer commented that the fixed supports I used for the bolts should be changed to pinned supports and the model re-run.
I can't really rationalize how this is a pinned support. If there were one blot I suppose the the structure could rotate around the axis of the bolt. However, with 4 bolts that motion is restricted. I would also assume that the head of the bolt can carry some moment when the load is along the axis of the bolts.
So which is correct, pinned or fixed for bolted connections?
Recently I wrote a structural analysis report for a structure that is bolted to the floor. At the locations where the bolt holes are I applied fixed boundary conditions. The engineer who reviewed the report for the customer commented that the fixed supports I used for the bolts should be changed to pinned supports and the model re-run.
I can't really rationalize how this is a pinned support. If there were one blot I suppose the the structure could rotate around the axis of the bolt. However, with 4 bolts that motion is restricted. I would also assume that the head of the bolt can carry some moment when the load is along the axis of the bolts.
So which is correct, pinned or fixed for bolted connections?