JMLH
Industrial
- Jun 4, 2019
- 7
For years we have been using this old method to measure torsion spring torque with constant rod and strap loaded weight (see the file attached: picture 1.pdf). We add the weight until the rod turns to target position.
We need to make a new machine to measure the torque in order to make it faster to use. There will be hydraulic cylinder + force sensor to turn the rod and measure the force. In order to be able to calculate comparable result, we need to understand the physics of the old method.
If the rod angle is horizontal (center on the picture), let's say 0°, the case is pretty simple; T = 0,1 m * 9,80665 m/s^2 * 1000 kg = 980,665 Nm.
The reason I wanted to ask your help, are the left and right cases on the picture, where the rod angle is ±15°. The strap loop is placed on top of the rod end and the strap loop is about 1 meter long (not pictured here), and the strap is basically non-elastic. I need help to determine if my distances on these cases are right or not; d(1) = 0,115 m and d(2) = 0,08662 meters. Or are they all 0,1 meters? What is your opinion on this?
We need to make a new machine to measure the torque in order to make it faster to use. There will be hydraulic cylinder + force sensor to turn the rod and measure the force. In order to be able to calculate comparable result, we need to understand the physics of the old method.
If the rod angle is horizontal (center on the picture), let's say 0°, the case is pretty simple; T = 0,1 m * 9,80665 m/s^2 * 1000 kg = 980,665 Nm.
The reason I wanted to ask your help, are the left and right cases on the picture, where the rod angle is ±15°. The strap loop is placed on top of the rod end and the strap loop is about 1 meter long (not pictured here), and the strap is basically non-elastic. I need help to determine if my distances on these cases are right or not; d(1) = 0,115 m and d(2) = 0,08662 meters. Or are they all 0,1 meters? What is your opinion on this?