Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Motor problem - loss of torque, slow acceleration with open shaft, noisy 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

ScottyUK

Electrical
May 21, 2003
12,915
I got asked to give a second opinion on a motor which we have at our overhaul contractor's works. The machine is a form-wound 3300V 250kW type on a 355 frame. It suffered a failed DE bearing which cooked itself, hence it was removed from site and sent for overhaul. The stator was untouched during the rebuild and we don't believe there has ever been a rewind, so we are reasonably confident that the stator connections are correct. The physical construction means that inadvertently swapping polarity of a winding could only occur during a rewind. The stator passed a Baker test.

Following rebuild the motor is noisy with a continuous low-frequency noise, not a growl or buzz, more of a rumble. The motor accelerates very slowly on an open shaft test where there is only windage and bearing friction to overcome. The rotor is mechanically free and coasts for a long period once moving. On this basis we think there is a gross lack of torque during acceleration rather than any mechanical drag. If the bearings were dragging to the point of stalling a 250kW machine they would be torn to bits, and this isn't happening. During a start attempt the motor crawled up to speed over about a minute or so, and the peak current captured by the clamp meter was just over running current, i.e. abnormally low for a DOL start.

The motor load is a centrifugal pump which currently presents very little load due to process conditions requiring very low flow, so it is entirely possible that it has been running in this state for a while without causing any apparent problem at the load..

My opinion from the symnptoms is that there is something wrong with the rotor rather than the stator. My current theory is that there is a fracture in the squirrel cage end-ring itself, and that some current is passing into a relatively high resistance steel retaining ring located inside the copper end-ring. As a result the currents in the squirrel cage are much smaller than expected, causing loss of torque and keeping the line current low. There a few electrical burns which indicate passage of current and perhaps light arcing. The brazes where the bars meet the ring, and the ring itself, are obscured by a heavy film of varnish and overspray. There are no visible cracks, but I'm getting it cleaned down to bare metal in prep for dye penentrant and/or ultrasonic NDT on the end ring and the brazing.

Has anyone seen a similar set of symptoms before? Am I on the right track, or am I totally off into the weeds? Any thoughts on other possible sources of the problem?

I am not certain whether the copper ring was cast and machined, or hewn out of solid plate: can anyone with experience of manufacturing this type of machine offer an opinion which is most likely? It may be of significance to the NDT guys, plus it will influence whether repair is viable or not.

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Did you try the single-phase low voltage test for broken rotor bars? If current remains fairly constant as you turn the rotor, you can rule out rotor bar problems. But, otoh, if there's no contact at all to one of the shorting rings, you may see a low but even current.

Next thing is to find a motor with similar data and do the same test, if current is significantly higher in the known-good motor - then you have a rotor problem.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.
 
Can we discuss that test a bit further Gunnar?

I know the motor shop did some testing prior to us being summoned, and they were confident that the bars themselves were sound. They are an old experienced shop so I give their opinion credibility, but I'm quite happy to ask them to undertake additional tests and I think they'll be happy to work with us.

Stator is star connected, 3.3kV with FLC of about 90A. We can certainly muster 240V single phase at a fairly high current. I think 240V will probably keep the line current within acceptable limits. I'm reasonably confident in understanding how a broken bar will manifest itself in a reduction in line current as the broken bar passes a pole, but I've not seen this test done for a cracked ring and don't really know what results it is likely to produce.

I don't have many similar motors to do a comparison with, so direct comparison is out of the question right now - the only similar machine is the duty pump while this one is in bits.



 
Scotty

I get the impression that youv'e done that test before. But we take it from the start, nonetheless.

3300 V delta would mean around 1900* V from star center to motor terminal. At standstill, the motor will draw LRA at 1900 V. Since very many things are nicely linear, it is safe to assume that LRA will be proportional to voltage.

If LRA is six times rated current, or 540 A, that would mean that 240 V should result in around 540*240/1900=68 A. That may be a problem in most shops, so I recommend a lower voltage, say 24 V from a transformer. That should result in just below 7 A.

If the shorting ring has separated completely, then you will not get that current. It will be considerably lower.

If the shorting ring is connected to a few bars, you will notice that current varies when the rotor is turned. Increasing when the bars are in the field under the active pole.

If the shorting ring is connected to most bars, except one or two, there will be expected current except for when the broken connections are under the active pole.

If you get expected LRA (for the used voltage) and there's no significant variation variation when the rotor is turned 360 degrees, you can assume that the rotor is OK. I doubt that you will get that result.


*Of course, you can use two twerminals and 3300 V in your calculations. I don't know, really, why I thought it would be better to use just one winding. Use what you find more convenient. If the star point isn't available it is obvious what the more convenient choice is :)

Check to see if you can find LRA for that particular motor and use that number instead of the assumed 6 times.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.
 
OK, remember now. If you use the star point, you don't need to worry about the to winding's voltage and phase relation.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.
 
Thanks Gunnar. I'd calculated for the supply across two lines and had estimated a current of about 40A or so which seems to match your calculation. It's been a while since I was on this type of work and wanted to check I wasn't about to get it embarrassingly wrong: I've been on switchgear replacement for a few years but a reshuffle now has me back in Maintenance. The diagnostic notes you provided are useful. :)

The shop has an 11kV supply of moderate capacity so it can do an unloaded full voltage run on most motors. 40A at 240V certainly isn't a problem. The star point is awkward to access, so I'll be going line-line.

My gut feeling is that there's a crack in the ring near a notch for a rotor bar, but I'm speculating. Will post some photos if I can get some.


DesertFox - thanks. This link is probably closer to what I was looking for, but your link has some good information.
 
The EASA link is a good one for rotor testing.

You might be tempted at first glance to think there is no danger of overheating during that single phase test as long as you keep the current below full load current. A little further thought reveals of course that is not true because there is not rotor rotation for cooling. So give some thought to how long you will apply current and whether you will monitor stator temperature.



=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?
 
Any thoughts on other possible sources of the problem?
Only very simple stuff which I'm sure you've already covered...

Just to clarify ... there are only stator three leads available? If so that rules out swapping the polarity of 1/3 phases as you know.

Were the stator currents verified balanced during the run? That would rule out gross supply imbalance.

What type of supply? (It might suggest some very remote scenarios).

It's hard to think of anything else other than a rotor problem. But with such an apparently severe rotor problem, I was a little surprised to hear no report of twice-slip frequency pulsating in the current, noise or vibration at some point during the start. But you never know. Good luck.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?
 
Thanks ePete, sound advice as normal.

The star point isn't brought out to the terminal box, and the way the leads are configured there's no practical way that two ends could be transposed except during a rewind which we don't think has taken place. We could get at the star point with additional effort, but until we've eliminated the more likely problems I'm not going to incur the extra cost of pulling the stator pack out of the casing.

The three line currents were balanced during the run, and the stator resistances are balanced on a ducter test.

Supply is 3300V resistance-earthed star annd is well balanced.

Very good point about limiting the duration of the test because of the lack of cooling, or perhaps using a lower voltage to keep I²R losses down as Gunnar suggested earlier.

I haven't seen the vibration signatures, but there wasn't audibly a very low frequency modulation of the sound it was producing. I wish I had my old low frequency analyser from the power plant, it was great for jobs like this.
 
Hi zlatkodo,

What outcome would you expect? On a good motor with no load it should rotate. On this one with a known problem, how would this test help localise the fault?
 
LOL ScottyUK,
I was AT[/b] that EASA convention in San Francisco and attended that lecture in your link! A few years later I was involved in a discussion about finding broken rotor bars in large motors and mentioned using a "growler" as depicted in that paper, because I remembered seeing it discussed. The people I was engaged with at the time brushed me off, saying that growlers were only useful for DC armatures, not AC rotors. I tried in vain at that time to find that info but eventually gave up (my Google-Fu skills were still weak then). Now, when I no longer need it of course, you post a link to the EXACT paper I was looking for at that time. Weird.

As I read your post, I immediately went to broker rotor connections somewhere in that motor, I have seen several very similar applications and that was what it turned out to be. When I was more heavily in the Soft Starter business, I noticed that a side benefit to that technology is in its uncanny ability to "find" rotor bar problems. My working theory is that the soft starters don't really create them as some people assume, but many motors already have rotor bar problems and the users never realize it because if accelerating Across-the-Line, the motor passes through the obvious effects too fast. When slowed down with a soft starter, it becomes much much more evident.

In fact come to think of it, you might try hooking up a small LV soft starter to your motor as a low power source to find it. Always seemed to work for me!

"Will work for (the memory of) salami"
 
Hi, Scotty,
Damage of the rotor can be detected using a method of three A-meters ( one in each stator phase) and stator connected to reduced voltage ( 10 - 25 % of nominal ).
You need to start with a very low voltage and then slowly increase and select the approx. maximum voltage while the rotor is yet stationary.
Turn the rotor slowly by hand and determine maximum and minimum values of each phase current in all positions from 0 to 360 degrees. One rotor turn is sufficient.
At serviceable rotor the currents in the stator phases in all positions of the rotor will be the same, and if there is a broken bar or bad contact between the bar and end ring, the currents will vary depending on the position of the rotor.

[URL unfurl="true"]http://winding.wix.com/design[/url]
 
I was thinking in-situ growler also Jeff. I would try low voltage across A-B and measure voltage across A-C while turning the rotor.
zlatkodo's suggestion would be the current version rather than the voltage version of the test.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
 
I really canot see the benefit of using two or three ammeters. I use one, as described earlier. Also, with three phases connected, it may be difficult to hold the rotor of larger machines and if you let them go they soon accelerate to rated speed. A heavy motor that hasn't been bolted down is not something you want to see running with more than a few RPM.

Finding three identical analog ammeters can also be tricky. So, unless the three ammeter method offers something extaordinary, I cannot see any reason to use more than one ammeter and a low voltage single phase supply. That, one an easily find anywhere. Three identical analogmeters and a reduced three-phase supply is not something you find in the field. Hardly ever in the electrical departmant of any large industry. I have a couple of large winder shops nearby (Imtech is one of them) and none of them have the necesary three identical analog ammeters. Using a three channel recorder is one way out, but that doesn't bring more than a single channel recorder.

Is this a cultural thing? "I say tomaato, you say tomayto"?

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
Half full - Half empty? I don't mind. It's what in it that counts.
 
Hello ScottyUK

Sympthons are evidencing a possible broken bar or broken ring in the squirell cage, the suggested test are fine to find this kind of problems, I.M.O. a single phase test could show the problem, if not, more accuracy testing most be performed, you could try with one core tester, is possible that you can test the rotor with high current,during the test the squirrel cage is covered with magnetic paper and you could see if some bar is broken.

An analysis of vibration records coul also help.

Regards

Carlos
 
A growler test and a single phase rotor test are, in principle and practice, the same test. In the case of the growler, the motor is disassembled and the coil that is used to measure the varying inductance of the defective rotor is a separate device (external to the motor). This test requires a fixture upon which the rotor can be mounted and rotated while positioned above the growler.

In the case of the single phase rotor test, one phase of the stator winding is used to detect the rotor fault and the motor frame, brackets, and bearings are used to position the rotor and allow rotation.

If you have a rotor fault of the magnitude that would cause the starting fault that you describe, either test will detect it.
 
Hello everyone,
In our motor shop we have induction motor with wound rotor for voltage regulation and three ammeter *one per phase* on the control cabinet .This gives us the conditions for reliable finding problems on the rotor on the way as suggested Zlatkodo . Sometimes we must warm up motor and then damage of the rotor is larger and more visible changes in current .
Good luck
 
I can't say I've heard of 3-phase off-line method before.

The single-phase off-line test is more standard. I can give three EASA refs, 3 EPRI refs and a textbook reference for the single-phase offline test. I haven't come across any references for the three-phase off-line test.

Preference for one or the other method may depend on equipment available.
Personal safety would require some more consideration during 3-phase test when people are manually rotating the rotor.

Is there supposed to be any sensitivity advantage of 3-phase test over single-phase test?


=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor