Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Nat Gas Engines - Starting with High Inertial Loads

Status
Not open for further replies.

Slagathor

Mechanical
Jan 6, 2002
129
I apologize in advance for the length of this...so please bear with me.

I am an area manager for a mfg of engineered pumping equipment. (I originally started in this industry as a Mech Engineer about 15 years ago). I have a problem involving natural gas engines being started with high inertial loads. This is causing some real problems on a project in progress and I need some guidance.

We are involved in a retrofit of an exiting large pump station for a major water district. The original pumps were supplied by our company about 10 years ago. In their original configuration, the pumps were driven by med/large natural gas engines (about 700 HP). These engines are mounted on cement piers. There are horizontal drive shafts about 8 feet long extending to right angle gear drives. These right angle drives each sit on top of a vertical turbine pump, which extends vertically down into the wet pit below.

These are centrifugal multistage pumps of medium specific speed. They have very low rotational moments of inertia. As such, the reactionary torque load from rotational acceleration is quite low. Centrifugal pump characteristics are such that the steady state torque (from work done by the pump) as a function of speed is a nearly perfectly parabolic. Essentially this means that the steady state torque the pump draws is MUCH lower than the torque rating of the engine right up to you get to full speed.

Because of these characteristics (low inertia and parabolic torque vs Speed), the owner was able to adopt the incorrect practice of starting the engine with the pump coupled to it. They never utilized the clutch. This allowed them to operate the station remotely.

Here is the problem. The pumps are being retrofitted to as new condition, new engines are being installed, and a new COMBO TYPE gear drives are being utilized along with electric motors. The electric motors are an addition to the drive system.

The new configuration is as follows: The new nat gas engines are still mounted on cement piers. There are still horizontal drive shafts about 8 feet long extending to right angle gear drives. These right angle drives sit on top of the vertical turbine pumps, which extend vertically down into the wet pit below. The difference is there are also now large electric motors sitting on top of the combo gear drives.

When the pump is driven by the electric motor, the clutch in the engine is disengaged so you don’t try to turn the engine. When the pump is driven by the motor, however, the induction motor remains engaged to handle the thrust loads of the pump. This means the system now has a LOT of added rotational inertia due to the induction motor.

The owner wants to start them coupled. The new engine mfg (NOT the same mfg as the old engines) is throwing a fit saying you CAN NOT START the engine coupled to the load. This is of course correct. Because of the inertial load, the engine will be in a range of unstable operation, and may not even be able to accelerate. It may even damage the engine.

The problem is the owner did it for 10 years with no issues. Of course they did not have a combo drive with a motor with a huge rotational inertia to spin up. If we blame the increased inertia of the motor, then the owner will likely throw up their hands…and cancel the motors, which gets us into all sorts of contractual issues because the motors are on order and we will have 100% cancellation charges on a bunch of 700 HP induction motors. Not pretty.

The original engine vendor won’t step up and tell the Owner that they were wrong for starting the units coupled all these years because they are sour about losing this bid. The Owner thinks the new engine mfg just wants to sell $300K in fancy clutches.

I need to write a technical memo explaining to the Owner, convincingly, why starting a Natural Gas Engine of this type (or perhaps and internal combustion engine) with a significant inertial load coupled to it is poor practice.

I was looking at getting Internal Combustion Engine Handbook: Basics, Components, Systems, and Perspectives by Richard Van Basshuysen and Fred Schafer for some guidance on the issue. Does anyone have any other recommendations? I am having a hard time finding any technical reference on IC engines with respect to starting loads and unstable operation, etc. I must make the Owner understand that they were never right to start these pump systems coupled. Any guidance is appreciated.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

There are many applicartions of engines driving pumps that will start and run as you have decribed, without needing a clutch. By design or luck, either way it worked for 10 years because the load was within the torque capability of the engine to accept the load and accelerate.

The driven load has changed, and it appears the current installed load is now outside the torque curve of the engine. Your choices are,

1. reduce load at start
2. install a limited slip control on the existing clutch to allow the unit to come up to speed.
3. install a torque convertor

None of these solutions are without problems of their own, and there may be other possible solutions. We have some rather large sewage pumps (2500 bhp) we use a limited slip on the clutch to get the shafting and pump up to speed without bogging down the engine. These systems take some time to get adjusted correctly, and depending on your controls and protections, those may require modification as well. But we have reasonable service life on the clutches and drums.

Virtually any IC engine will have trouble starting high loads, turbocharged engines will likely have more problems than natual aspirated engines. And engine manufacturers don't always supply torque curves that go below their defined normal operating ranges.

We have some 500 bhp deep well pumps that don't have a clutch at all, just a chain type coupling to allow for service, they have been in service for about 6 years with no apparent problems.

Check with the engine manufacturer's application and installation guides, some provide guidelines for pump drive applications, usually in petroleum applications.

We have similar problems with tub grinders, some can keep the clutch engaged all the time and start just fine, some have to use the clutch, some won't work with a darn with a mechanical clutch and the only way to get thenm to work correctly was to install a torque convertor. All were built by reputable companies, just seemd the actual dynamics did things that were diffcult to predict.

Hope that helps.
 
Hi.

If I understand your application properly the electic motors will have variable speed drives which might be able to drive the motor to offset or minimize inertia effects the motor may have on the starting/lightly loaded engine. And keep the engine supplier happy.

Engine rpm or govenor setpoint/target rpm might be a reference for the VSD to work from.


Just a thought.

Tony.
 
The motors are medium voltage..and are in fact VFD driven (Toshiba VFDs). The problem with the motor/VFD assist is that the purpose of the engines is to run when the power is out. Hard to run the VFD in that case....
 
What about a small backup generator, just enough to power one electric motor at a time to get the gas engines started one by one?
 
Small Backup Generator? 700 HP Medium voltage. Not small....and very expensive.....and way too complicated.

Back to the subject at hand. I need technical documentation on stable operation and starting of IC motors under high loads.
 
I assume 700hp is the max power rating. How much power does it take to crank the engine?
 
Slagathor,

In my world the starting of an engine relies upon two things: -

A) That the engine speed is sufficiently high to allow proper mixing & preparation of the charge such that, upon ignition, combustion occurs and there is no misfire.

B) Sufficient torque is produced on each powerstroke, from the first ignition event after the starter is disengaged, to ensure that the rotational momentum of the flywheel can sustain the engine speed detailed in A).

To put it simply, as soon as you have initiated sustainable combustion you can go from zero load to full load after only a few revolutions of the crank.

Im not sure if I am missing the point but I think it is the engine manufacturer that you need to consult first. If they provided you with a suitable starting strategy then you would be OK.

The only thing I would ever have reservations about when starting an engine from cold at high load would be degradation of the bearing surfaces within said engine due to low oil pressure.


MS
 
In my first hand experience, when crank starting antique engines, a minimal rpm is not required to fire the engine. They can be started by turning slowly for 2 complete turns, then pulling up on the firing stroke as slow as you like, then gust tripping it over TDC.

What is required is that the spark timing is set to fire somewhat after TDC (say 10 deg) so it does not want to run backward until inertia builds up.

For this to work, the engine must have good spark and the valves and rings must seal very well so it holds compression at very low speed.

Also the exhaust valve must not open to soon before BDC so it extracts the full power from the first power stroke.

It also requires sufficient fuel to form a combustible fuel vapour and air mix. This usually requires excess fuel as much of it will not evaporate. The excess fuel might need to be supplied by an auxiliary method such as choking the carby above the discharge nozzle so engine suction draws extra fuel in, or a squirt bottle or spray can of very low boiling point hydrocarbon.

Once it fires once under good conditions, the power of the first stroke should produce enough inertia to get it to the next power stroke, which should be stronger etc etc.

This is for an unload engine. Once a load is applied, there must be sufficient inertia to overcome the load. One classic method to do this was used on the 1902 Oldsmobile. They lifted a valve, had wound the engine with a heavy flywheel until sufficient speed had built up, then engaged the valve operating mechanism. I think this was to allow the magneto to spin fast enough to make a spark.

The concept of full load on a cold engine has several problems.

Lack of lubrication.

High oil viscosity.

Excessive piston to bore clearance.

Bores being washed down due to excessively rich mixture to compensate for poor evaporation. Remember it is only fuel vapour that actually burns.

Possibly excessive tappet clearance.

Possibly reduced head gasket clamping force.

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
 
Opps. Just reread the OP and heading about CNG fuel. Forget the parts about poor evaporation and rich mixture to compensate, and bores washing down. Clearance and lubrication problems still apply.

Regards

eng-tips, by professional engineers for professional engineers
Please see FAQ731-376 for tips on how to make the best use of Eng-Tips Fora.
 
We start all of our compressors driven by natural gas engines with out clutches. Besides huge amounts of mass in the compressors, there is even work load on the compressors (even the recylce start up valve allows some load).
 
We have built a hydraulic starting system for a stump grinder to eliminate the clutch or torque convertor problem. The rotor weighs several tons and runs 600 rpm. When a V12-149 Detroit Diesel (over 1,000 hp) with torque convertor was installed the torque convertor only lasted a few months. The prior smaller engine (about 800 hp) had clutch failure 3 to 4 times per year. The current drive is 4 Cummins engines at about 450+ hp each connected together by belt drive.

The system requires an engine driven hydraulic power unit, a hydraulic valve and several hydraulic starting motors. Cost is far less than a clutch or torque convertor and substantially lower maintenance.


Ed Danzer
 
What kind of stump requires 1800 HP to grind? Sorry for the off topic post but that is pretty unbelievable.
 
EdDanzer, that must be one hell of a belt! But I guess it's relatively forgiving on the machinery.
 
The advantage of hydraulic starting is elimination of clutch or torque and maximum power transmission. This machine can eat stumps from trees 3ft in diameter in a few seconds and can have two excavators feed material into it. The dropping of wads of brush or stumps causes high power draw for short times so 8V Kevlar belts are used.

Ed Danzer
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor