CNCLLC
Structural
- May 16, 2008
- 14
I have a building rehabilitation project which consist of an existing skating rink being converted to manufacturing. The existing slab on grade slopes to drains and owner wants to level the floor by pouring an additional 5"+ concrete slab on top of the existing slab on grade.
The literature that I found regarding reinforcing of slab on grades states that the amount of reinforcing is directly proportional to the friction between the concrete and the soil. The existing slab appears to be coated and to minimize costs the owner does not wish to prep the surface. I am concerned that, with minimal friction, the typical slab on grade reinforcing may not be adequate, however, ACI requirements for shrinkage steel seems a bit excessive.
I know that in typical slab on grade construction there are two schools of thought regarding the location of vapor barrier below slab. One has the barrier below a layer of soil and the other has the barrier directly below the slab, so there cannot be any soil friction.
Is this an issue or am I being overly concerned.
The literature that I found regarding reinforcing of slab on grades states that the amount of reinforcing is directly proportional to the friction between the concrete and the soil. The existing slab appears to be coated and to minimize costs the owner does not wish to prep the surface. I am concerned that, with minimal friction, the typical slab on grade reinforcing may not be adequate, however, ACI requirements for shrinkage steel seems a bit excessive.
I know that in typical slab on grade construction there are two schools of thought regarding the location of vapor barrier below slab. One has the barrier below a layer of soil and the other has the barrier directly below the slab, so there cannot be any soil friction.
Is this an issue or am I being overly concerned.