jaycarper
Chemical
- Jun 29, 2009
- 2
I just started at a new facility and after reviewing their annual fire pump data I noticed the pressure settings for the fire pump were off. Also this facility has had fire pipe ruptures in the past which I think was due to the water hammer effect based on these pressure settings: Currently the fire pump starts at 100psi and the jockey pump starts at 120psi. The system with no flow at max churn operates at 145psi. As a result I want to change the jockey pump start to 135psi and the fire pump start to 130psi.
Is it correct to assume that having the jockey and fire pump start and stop so far apart from the operating pressure that it would cause a waterhammer and changing it to the NFPA recommendations would help prevent this?
Also when I went to the fire system contractor to make these changes he told me that this was a bad idea and that the NFPA was going to be changed and if I followed the NFPA and tighting the on/off pressure spread it was cause more damage to the system and pumps. Is there any basis in his concern and has anyone heard that the NFPA 20 is being challenged on their pressure recommendations?
Is it correct to assume that having the jockey and fire pump start and stop so far apart from the operating pressure that it would cause a waterhammer and changing it to the NFPA recommendations would help prevent this?
Also when I went to the fire system contractor to make these changes he told me that this was a bad idea and that the NFPA was going to be changed and if I followed the NFPA and tighting the on/off pressure spread it was cause more damage to the system and pumps. Is there any basis in his concern and has anyone heard that the NFPA 20 is being challenged on their pressure recommendations?