Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

NFPA 25 Deficiency vs Installation Deficiency

Status
Not open for further replies.

ContractorDave

Mechanical
Jan 16, 2007
364
We've hashed this out before but there's always something new.

Here's a fun one: I have an unlisted diesel fire pump (an 80 gpm / 80 ft head end suction Aurora on a small 4kw Yanmar). It's fed from a combination domestic / fire water tank with a float that shuts water off to domestic at a certain level. There's a Watts DCVA after the fire pump along with a Vic 708W and a flow switch. But there is no main drain. There's no test and drain. No drain whatsoever except a 1/2" outlet on a snap tee below the flow switch where a Pressure-Trol switch is mounted and tied into a neat little starter for the diesel. You lose pressure and the diesel starts. Kind of tidy really. Except with no drain you can't mechanically test the flow switch or reduce the pressure in the system to test the fire pump, or forward flow test the DCVA. Or drain down the system to do maintenance or modifications. There's no FDC either. Interestingly enough, there IS a hydraulic data plate (check THAT box!) on the riser from a well know company. I'd show you a pic but don't want to divulge the companies name. They have stickers everywhere.

So you're doing an inspection. What's on your deficiency list?

Regards
Dave


Regards
D

A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be
Thomas Paine
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

What year was it installed

Who all approved it

Not a contractor , seems like you would write what is wrong, but note what are changes since the system was installed
And if stuff was not installed originally make that note
 
Installed in 1999 in a remote northern Canadian hamlet with the approval of the AHJ of the time though I'm willing to bet there was no site review by the engineer who drew it up. He would have likely stamped an as-built with the qualifying statement that this stamp was based on red-lines submitted by the contractor.

My question from the original post is based on NFPA 25
1.1.3 This standard addresses the operating condition of fire protection systems as well as impairment handling and reporting and applies to fire protection systems that have been properly installed in accordance with generally accepted practice.
1.1.3.1 This standard does not require the inspector to verify the adequacy of the design of the system.

I would recommend an engineers review of the system, but what might I call a deficiency?

If there's a main drain in a building but I can't get a full flow out of it because the floor drain won't take it, is that a deficiency?

If there's no main drain to perform this rather important test, is that a deficiency to NFPA 25?

If there's no test and drain to mechanically test the flow switch? These are installation deficiencies that directly affect my being able to perform proper inspections. The rest of this system is actually as good as it gets for up here. The report as per 25 would not have any deficiencies but would note there are installation deficiencies.

That would be my interpretation....



Regards
D

A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be
Thomas Paine
 

A.1.1.3.1 The requirement to evaluate the adequacy of the design of the installed system is not a part of the periodic inspection, testing, and maintenance requirements of this standard. However, such evaluation is the responsibility of the property owner or designated representative as indicated in 4.1.5 and 4.1.6.


4.1.6.2 Where the evaluation reveals that the installed system is inadequate to protect the building or hazard in question, the property owner or designated representative shall make the required corrections.


seems like at some point if a company is looking at a system and does not bring problems, even if they were part of the intial installation, takes on some liability. To include, if you cannot even properly isnpect the system.

are there companies out there that just do the paperwork and leave yes.

maybe also set down with the ahj and try to do some education, may or may not help in this case.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor