Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Nitrogen gas density calculation

Status
Not open for further replies.

vtmike

Mechanical
Mar 12, 2008
139
Hi,

I have a tank with internal volume 2.01 L filled with N2 gas at 308K. The pressure inside the tank is 340.23 atm. I am trying to find the density of gas inside the tank. This is required becase the tool inside this chamber cannot operate above densities of .036 lb/in^3.
P = 340.23 atm ; T = 308K ; V = 2.01 L ; R = .0821 L.atm/Mol.K

This is how far I got,
1) Using Ideal gas equation,
PV = nRT
n = 27.04 moles
Thus, density = 376.67 g/L = .013 lb/in^3

2) Using Van Der Waals correction,
P = (nRT/(V-nb)) - ((n^2)*a/V^2)
For Nitrogen (N2), a = 1.37 L^2-atm/mol^2 ; b = .0387 L/mol
n = 49.97
Thus, density = 696 g/L = .025 lb/in^3

Now when I toook the pressure down to 204.13 atm, I expected the density to go down but the density infact increased which did not make any sense to me.

When, P = 204.13 atm ==> Density = .026 lb/in^3 From van Der Waals Equation.
On the other hand, when P = 204.13 atm ===> Density = .008 lb/in^3 using Ideal Gas Equation.

Can anyone explain how the density is going up using Van Der Waals equation when the pressure is reduced?

Thanks,
Mike

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I'm not saying its not a good idea to try to calculate it yourself, and assuming your math is correct; perhaps a pretty good stretch, have you ever heard of NIST gas property calculator website?

You might try other EOS methods; BWR maybe.

"We have a leadership style that is too directive and doesn't listen sufficiently well. The top of the organisation doesn't listen sufficiently to what the bottom is saying." Tony Hayward CEO BP
"Being GREEN isn't easy." Kermit[frog]
 

Using your figures for a, b, R, T, and P, I get n ~ 23.02 not 49.97.

Bringing the pressure down to 204.13 atm, I get n ~ 16.

Therefore kindly check your calculations and report back. Thanks.
 
I agree with 25362's result of n=23.02 using van der Waal. Using the NIST data I get n=22.74 and Uconeer (based on the Peng-Robinson EOS) gives n=23.82. All of these give densities safely below your tool's limit.

Uconeer is a free units conversion program available from the link in my signature below.

Katmar Software
Engineering & Risk Analysis Software
 
Thanks for the replies everyone.

25362 & katmar you are both right. Apparently it was a simple algebric error in my calculations. n is approximately 23 using Van Der Waals correction to ideal.

Thanks,
Mike
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor