Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

node mass problem

Status
Not open for further replies.

jisb007

Bioengineer
May 14, 2005
33
Hello,

I met some weired warning message when I try to model a breakable bond:

WARNING: "In tied contact pair 3, node 291 on the slave surface UPPER_S has 9.1 times more mass than the mass of node 49901 on the master surface UPPER_M. Significant contact noise may result with the kinematic contact algorithm when the slave nodes have significantly
greater mass than the master nodes. Suggested workaround includes using mass-scaling to adjust the ratio of nodal masses."


Can someone tell me 1) why nodes have masses too? -- I thought only elements do; and 2) how can I solve it? -- My slace surface/nodes belong to a material much "lighter" than the master surface/nodes/elements.

Thanks very much.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

1) Strictly speaking elements don't have mass associated with them - the corresponding nodes defining an element have the mass "smeared" at the nodes.

2) I think the answer is in your question (large differential mass). As it's only a warning, I wouldn't be concerned unless your analysis starts to fall over or your results are physically unreasonable.


------------
See faq569-1083 for details on how to make best use of Eng-Tips.com
 
Thanks. But there's the mass scaling in abaqus -- that applies to the elements, right? Also, when specifying the density of the material and to get the mass, it has to be defined on the elements as well, since only elements have "volume", not nodes. So, I am still confused why "strictly speaking", elements don't have mass and that the nodes carry them. THanks very much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor