Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Non-Circular Vessel Design

Status
Not open for further replies.

PVGuy

Mechanical
Apr 16, 2002
77
hello,

I am looking for a method to design flat plates under low pressure and some accelerations. The shapes do not fall within the scope of App. 13 in SC 8-1. One shape has an elliptical cross-section, the other is hopper like with an inverted pyramid shape attached to the bottom of a cube shape. The pressures, materials, and inert nature of the contents do not justify the expense of FEA. Any suggestions on a reference? Or just sweat it out with Roark?

Thanks in advance
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

"Sweat it out with Roark" sounds like a good approach. Actually, you can make some conservative assumptions and check the results- if the results show it's okay, you're all set. If the results are unreasonable, then you know you need to go into more detail.

For example- on ellipse, perhaps consider checking as a circle with both the major and minor diameters, and figure you're results ought to be in between there. For a triangle, figure it ought to be stronger than a square with those dimensions. (assuming triangles and ellipses aren't in there, which they may be).

If you get someone really familiar with FEA, they could probably whip up a flat-plate design of arbitrary shape fairly quickly- about the easiest problem that could be done with FEA.
 
Well JStephen, the elliptical section would be calculated based onto the major diameter, as the hoop stress is maximum there (and is easily calculated as Pa/t, a being the major semiaxis). However bending stresses also exist, they cannot be neglected as they are primary, and if I recall correctly they are maximum exactly at the major diameter. Roark does not seem to have the formula for this, but I think that it can be found on the net(a few years ago I had it, but can't find anymore).
Otherwise I concur with the reference to Roark. If the budget does not allow for FEA, then it is also possible to adopt ample margins based onto a rough analysis, and be prepared to add some stiffeners after hydrotest.

prex

Online tools for structural design
 
JStephen and Prex,

Thank you both.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor