Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Non-Slam Style Check Valve 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

sshep

Chemical
Feb 3, 2003
761
My Friends,

Is there a rule of thumb for when a non-slam type check valve should be considered?

I just saw an incident notification where water hammer shattered the body of a 16" cooling water check valve (see attached picture). My project's big pumps for cooling water, fire water, ect are all specified to have non-slam check valves, but it isn't clear what size and pressure this starts to be a concern.

best wishes,
SShep
 
 http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=ebb3fdb1-d22f-43cf-80da-e6bdfe208ea5&file=Check_Valve_Body_Rupture.jpg
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Systems should be designed so that non-slam check valves are not required. These incidents are usually associated with water hammer.

For larger systems such as you describe, measures such as slowing the time for valves to close will eliminate some of the potential for water hammer.

Where long straight lengths of piping and elevation changes are constructed, the possibility of water hammer and flow reversal are much more likely and these scenarios should be evaluated more thoroughly.

One cause of water hammer is the sudden shutdown of pumps from power failure.

 
Thanks My Friends,

This was good info. The Val-matic literature had some quantitative guidance which was cool.

bimr, what was the source of your extract in case I need to make a citation.

best wishes,
Sean
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor