plantguyjj
Mechanical
- Mar 22, 2007
- 16
Tom,
Can you please comment on the methodology behind the output for the nozzle neck thickness calcs?
Ignore external pressure and area reinforcement calcs and just consider a small bore nozzle subject to internal pressure (in rating mode). It looks like to me that Compress is using the UG(45) thickness for the nozzle and solving for the allowable pressure in the cylinder that is connected to the nozzle (tr from UG-37(a). It then appears to set the nozzle design pressure to the allowable pressure determined from the cylinder and solve for a nozzle neck thickness.
Most of my work with Compress is evaluating existing vessels, not new design. I see cases where my nozzle neck is greater than the UG(45) but Compress appears to be limiting the allowable pressure of the nozzle. If the nozzle neck is greater than the UG-45 min, why not just use UG-27(c)(1)and determine an MAWP for the nozzle neck based on the available wall thickness?
Also, I have noticed that I do not get a deficiency message during cases where the MAWP for the nozzle neck is less than the design pressure of the cylinder that it is attached to. I can submit a file to demonstrate this if desired.
thanks
Can you please comment on the methodology behind the output for the nozzle neck thickness calcs?
Ignore external pressure and area reinforcement calcs and just consider a small bore nozzle subject to internal pressure (in rating mode). It looks like to me that Compress is using the UG(45) thickness for the nozzle and solving for the allowable pressure in the cylinder that is connected to the nozzle (tr from UG-37(a). It then appears to set the nozzle design pressure to the allowable pressure determined from the cylinder and solve for a nozzle neck thickness.
Most of my work with Compress is evaluating existing vessels, not new design. I see cases where my nozzle neck is greater than the UG(45) but Compress appears to be limiting the allowable pressure of the nozzle. If the nozzle neck is greater than the UG-45 min, why not just use UG-27(c)(1)and determine an MAWP for the nozzle neck based on the available wall thickness?
Also, I have noticed that I do not get a deficiency message during cases where the MAWP for the nozzle neck is less than the design pressure of the cylinder that it is attached to. I can submit a file to demonstrate this if desired.
thanks