Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

nozzle repad

Status
Not open for further replies.

mdischarge

Mechanical
Feb 21, 2006
9
for shell or head thickness over 40 mm , the repad should be integrally attached to the nozzle. any reason?
thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Well on a practical sense, the amount of heat from the weld you need to attach the re-pad can cause some distortion or the base metal to sink.
 
First off, is this a Code requirement? For some reason I don't recall this as a requirement.

Second - if this is not a code requirement it is a good practice to do because it provides additional load carrying capacity, and in my opinion increases resistance to failure from fatigue crack propagation in service.

The code only requires a fillet weld for the joint between the repad OD surface and the nozzle. However, I have seen fatigue crack propagation off the toe of this fillet weld into a nozzle, and have seen cracking that started from the nozzle/shell weld underneath the repad. This resulted in a leak thru the tell tale hole. I always require full penetration tie in between the repad and nozzle, with an external fillet weld, in lieu of only a fillet weld.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor