Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

NX1899 : Site standards -- Part Version ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jan 24, 2020
80
0
0
US
Hi All,

Iam curious what is the best to fill in the field for Part version in Site Standards in NX Customer Defaults ? NX1899 is being used.

How does the setting help when using it as NX manager?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

@Cowski,

Assemblies -> site standards -> part name versions? or a different setting? -- Yes

Are you currently using a PDM/PLM system such as Teamcenter or Windchill? -- Teamcenter and Native ( windows folder options )
 
If you open the link in my previous post and search for "part name versions" it will take you to the relevant section (with examples). When I opened the link on the Siemens site, it took me right there - apparently, my copy & paste link does not.

www.nxjournaling.com
 
@Cowski,

Do you know if this would also affect Teamcenter search or adding components in NX manager? I think this part versioning is good when working in Native NX.

Let me know if this should be set for effective working on Teamcenter and NXmanager.
 
cowski said:
To the best of my knowledge, those settings do not affect how TC handles parts/revisions.

Correct. In Managed mode Teamcenter handles the revisioning of parts/components.
There is versioning in Teamcenter, but this is something different compared to revisions...
In Managed mode, Teamcenter keeps the last 5 (I think this is the default setting) saved versions of your part.
Each time you do a save , the oldest version is removed.

Comes in handy when you want to go back a few steps which are already saved.

Ronald van den Broek
Senior Application Engineer
Winterthur Gas & Diesel Ltd
NX9 / TC10.1.2

Building new PLM environment from Scratch using NX12 / TC11
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top