Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

NX7.5 2D drafting Dimension associativity

Status
Not open for further replies.

SDETERS

Agricultural
May 1, 2008
1,281
We are migrating from I-Deas to NX7.5 I am now doing my first real drawing with dimensions and text. Is it better to use the "model" reference set and dimension to the Features Edges, Surfaces Ect. Or is it better to use the "entire part" reference set to associate our 2D dimension to the reference geometry that we made those features from? Which method is more robust to keep dimension from losing associativity? I Started using the "entire part" reference set, but when I switched the reference set back to model all of my dimensions lost associativity

Thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

When you create a Master Model Drawing, the system defaults to the 'Model' Reference Set for a reason.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
UG/NX Museum:
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 
There is many setting that NX defaults to. I did not know if one way was prefered over the other. So Model Reference set it is. Thanks
 
Not a wealth of reference set experience here....and what experience I do have with them wasn't used to control the context of the display of the geometry in drafting - it was used to display BREPS (faceted models) of components when working on gigantic assemblies with many components.

Unless I've got a centerline that is almost impossible to define with Utility Symbols, I've always dimensioned to model edges and faces rather than reference/construction geometry.

You could feasibly remove all parameters and then remove all reference geometry from a model and completely blow up all dims on a drawing - using model edges and utility symbols would more than likely keep that from happening.

I'm sure other users might have different approaches - just my experiences and preferences.

Tim Flater
NX Designer
 
And as of NX 7.5 there is NO longer any need to use Reference Sets to manage lightweight representations in a large, or for that matter, any size assembly.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
UG/NX Museum:
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 
Not doing so by choice - customer requirement.

Tim Flater
NX Designer
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor