kitabel
Automotive
- Dec 14, 2005
- 20
I've been back and forth on this, and found not only conflicting data and answers, but strange geometric reasoning.
1. "the pad radius is the long (valve-side) lever arm length", but (if true) why are there so many shorter exceptions?
2. "the radius is the valve lift" (no reason given)
3. "as long as it doesn't present an angle to the stem it's not important"
Clearly, the radius must present at whatever arc position of the lever during the full range of lift. If the radius is too small, the stem edge strikes the rocker lever at zero &/or full lift, rather than the pad. If the radius is too large, rolling motion is reduced and scrub increases.
AFAIK, since there is both rolling and scrubbing motion involved, is the radius an attempt to reduce scrub to the absolute minimum?
I've tried to plot changes in ratio, but it's all over the place...
Almost all of the better on-line tech stuff is aircraft, locomotive, diesel, etc. with roller tips and useless.
Anyone?
Links?
1. "the pad radius is the long (valve-side) lever arm length", but (if true) why are there so many shorter exceptions?
2. "the radius is the valve lift" (no reason given)
3. "as long as it doesn't present an angle to the stem it's not important"
Clearly, the radius must present at whatever arc position of the lever during the full range of lift. If the radius is too small, the stem edge strikes the rocker lever at zero &/or full lift, rather than the pad. If the radius is too large, rolling motion is reduced and scrub increases.
AFAIK, since there is both rolling and scrubbing motion involved, is the radius an attempt to reduce scrub to the absolute minimum?
I've tried to plot changes in ratio, but it's all over the place...
Almost all of the better on-line tech stuff is aircraft, locomotive, diesel, etc. with roller tips and useless.
Anyone?
Links?