The table in section 9 of the EASA Tech Manual is identical to table 2.7 of AR100 (2001).
One pattern you'll see if you look at the numbers is smaller shafts have higher ratio.
~2.5 mils/inch for 2" shaft
~ 2 mils/inch for 4" shaft
~ 1.5 mils/inch for 6" shaft
~ 1 mil per inch for 16" shaft
I have seen 1 mil per inch on 6" shaft associated with gearbox. I think in that case precise positioning of the shaft is important.
There are wide variations and a lot of design factors can drive it in different directions.
Speed could drive it either way. All other things being equal high speed machine is generally closer to instability which would drive toward smaller clearances, but high speed machine generates more heat which would drive towards higher clearances. Quite a number of other factors of course play into stability and temperature.
I have seen 6" shaft with one mil per inch specified by OEM for the sleeve bearings. It was on a gearbox. I think in that application precise control of shaft position is critical for proper gear operation.
Here on page 7,6th column you see tabulated fractional clearance c/d for a wide variety of applications. It seems many applications are close to c/d~0.001 which of course in one mil per inch. Maybe those are large applications?
For motors I don't think the variation is so wide and the EASA numbers are good. EASA is THE trade organization for US service shops and that AR100 standard is often invoked as part of a repair specification.
=====================================
Eng-tips forums: The best place on the web for engineering discussions.