BecomingCurmudgeon
Structural
- May 2, 2011
- 8
I am trying to recall how things used to be detailed in the early 1990s.
I am looking at a current project where the design engineer spec'd a 4" concrete slab on 2" composite floor deck (6" overall depth). He used Fibermesh and no mild reinf. The slab cracked in tension down the backs of the girders and there are other cracks over the beams. It is going to be difficult to put a floor finish on now. The owner wants a second opinion.
I remember that in the 90s, my first boss always installed 6' long rebar spaced at 48" down the backs of the girders at the top of the slab. He also installed mild reinf over the beams at the top of the slab. We never had cracks. It was commonly done in upstate New York at that time. It was not so much an engineered solution but a conventional practice. I have since moved and the old firm is gone so there are no old colleagues to ask.
I have been looking for a source that discusses my old boss's detailing preference for this. Anyone remember?
I am looking at a current project where the design engineer spec'd a 4" concrete slab on 2" composite floor deck (6" overall depth). He used Fibermesh and no mild reinf. The slab cracked in tension down the backs of the girders and there are other cracks over the beams. It is going to be difficult to put a floor finish on now. The owner wants a second opinion.
I remember that in the 90s, my first boss always installed 6' long rebar spaced at 48" down the backs of the girders at the top of the slab. He also installed mild reinf over the beams at the top of the slab. We never had cracks. It was commonly done in upstate New York at that time. It was not so much an engineered solution but a conventional practice. I have since moved and the old firm is gone so there are no old colleagues to ask.
I have been looking for a source that discusses my old boss's detailing preference for this. Anyone remember?