Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

OTP versus soldering process

Status
Not open for further replies.

felixc

Electrical
Feb 4, 2003
468
Hi,
I have the option to use OTP microcontrollers (an old 87C42) on a surface-mounted board. I am wondering if the OTP can lose its contents when it is subected to the heat of the surface mount reflow. Or should I use sockets all the time? Did anyone go through an issue like this?
Felixc
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Follow the datasheet's specified heat flow cycle and you'll be fine. I'm surprised to find an OTP in surface mount config, though... didn't realize they still made those combinations.


Dan
Owner
 
You should be fine but I would highly recommend using a flash microcontroller like most of the Microchip PIC families. You can get them in surface mount packages and include a connector on your board for reprogramming them right in the circuit (without having to take the chip off the board).
 
Surface mounted OTPs were a popular item 10 years ago, before flash started taking the place. Unfortunately Intel does not support these products anymore, although they still make them.

leonar40, this is for a "shrink down" design, that allows no software rewriting, so I am stuck with this MCU. Take a look at the Zilog Z8Encore chips, they're cheaper than the equivalent PICs.

 
OTP's used to come in two varieties, fuse-link and EPROM. The fuse-link variety were programmed by physical destruction of fuses, which was extremely permanent and not affected by temperature.

The EPROM variety was basically a UV-erasable EPROM without a window, hence OTP. Slightly less robust, but a short jaunt through a reflow machine should be no big deal, since they were capable of maintaining storage at 125ºC junction temperatures for years.

TTFN
 
isn't OTP cheaper than FLASH ?


<nbucska@pcperipherals DOT com> subj: eng-tips
read FAQ240-1032
 
It is an older technology. Flash devices are now cheaper to produce.
I'll try to manage enough space for PLCC SMT sockets so both ways will do.
 
The answer to your questions is no, unless you are applying MASSIVE amounts of heat, this is in the data sheet.

Flash devices are only now starting to be cheaper for 8 bit processors, i can still get fairly powerful 8bit OTP processors from motorola that do the job and are dirt cheap...

I actually just started a design with a 16K ROM, 1.1K ram, full LCD driver, DTMF encoder/decoder, 4 8 bit i/o ports, PLL, timers, interputs etc for US$1.60... Like to see somthing like that in flash :) not likely :) but would LOVE to be proven wrong!! (i only really need the DTMF enconder/decoder, but this is cheaper than mode DTMF encoder/decoders that i could find with a cheap micro)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor