metengr
Materials
- Oct 2, 2003
- 15,478
FYI:
From time to time, questions are asked regarding painting or coating of a pressure vessel or even a pressure retaining item prior to hydrotesting.
I was forwarded this interesting article that was published in Materials Evaluation, September, 1993. The article is titled " Don't Paint Before Hydrostatic Testing" and is authored by Jon Batey.
To summarize, the author explains how the various construction codes and in-service repair codes like the NBIC are either silent or briefly mention caution on the issue of painting or coating before hydrostatic testing.
Several tests were actually conducted on a 4” Schedule 40 carbon steel pipe that was internally pressurized with specific hold times at 1100 (30 min), 2000 (10 min) and 2400 psig (5 min). The pressure was increased in 100 psig increments. The various coating systems that were evaluated consisted of;
- vinyl finish over inorganic zinc primer
- vinyl finish over vinyl primer
- epoxy finish or epoxy primer
The pipe section was pre-dilled with twelve, small diameter thru holes (0.0135" and 0.020") to simulate weld or fabrication defects.
The results of the pressure tests revealed some interesting results;
- in a test pressure range of 325 psi to 1125 psi, the vinyl coating systems failed. At the onset of failure, the vinyl coating locally disbonded into a blister that ruptured.
- the epoxy system adhered and did not disbond even at 2425 psig pressure.
So, you may want to think twice during fabrication of pressure retaining items to coat after hydrostatic testing to make it easier for your AI.
From time to time, questions are asked regarding painting or coating of a pressure vessel or even a pressure retaining item prior to hydrotesting.
I was forwarded this interesting article that was published in Materials Evaluation, September, 1993. The article is titled " Don't Paint Before Hydrostatic Testing" and is authored by Jon Batey.
To summarize, the author explains how the various construction codes and in-service repair codes like the NBIC are either silent or briefly mention caution on the issue of painting or coating before hydrostatic testing.
Several tests were actually conducted on a 4” Schedule 40 carbon steel pipe that was internally pressurized with specific hold times at 1100 (30 min), 2000 (10 min) and 2400 psig (5 min). The pressure was increased in 100 psig increments. The various coating systems that were evaluated consisted of;
- vinyl finish over inorganic zinc primer
- vinyl finish over vinyl primer
- epoxy finish or epoxy primer
The pipe section was pre-dilled with twelve, small diameter thru holes (0.0135" and 0.020") to simulate weld or fabrication defects.
The results of the pressure tests revealed some interesting results;
- in a test pressure range of 325 psi to 1125 psi, the vinyl coating systems failed. At the onset of failure, the vinyl coating locally disbonded into a blister that ruptured.
- the epoxy system adhered and did not disbond even at 2425 psig pressure.
So, you may want to think twice during fabrication of pressure retaining items to coat after hydrostatic testing to make it easier for your AI.