Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Passive Resistance of Berm

Status
Not open for further replies.

RFreund

Structural
Aug 14, 2010
1,881
I'm trying to get a preliminary idea on sizes/anchors, etc, for some excavation bracing for an excavation to an existing bluff.
How would you estimate the passive resistance of the berm in front of the sheet piling. This seems to be somewhat debated.
I'd be interested in using both short duration values and long-term effective values (mixed phi-c)?
If I use some sort of effective slope, it exceeds the effective friction angle. The effective soil values are approx phi = 28-32 deg and c= 200-500psf.

Passive_Resistance_of_Berm_aysozo.png


Thanks!

EIT
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

At a Qu at 4 - 5 t/sf, why not just cut back the upper slope to match the original? Assuming the former slope was stable. Driving sheet piles may cause some problems not anticipated.
 
If the existing bluff is fairly stable now, why not just flatten the slope back to the same spot that the top of the sheeting wall would be? First, analyze the existing slope using estimated soil properties to show a safety factor of 1 and then use the same properties to analyze the new, flatter slope.

Also, I would expect a 30' or wider flat area in front of the wall to provide full passive resistance. A tiedback wall would not be the first solution that I would investigate. Will you be able to even drive sheeting that deep into soil that stiff?

 
Thanks for the additional comments and you have good points (as usual). A few responses:

PEinc said:
If the existing bluff is fairly stable now, why not just flatten the slope back to the same spot that the top of the sheeting wall would be?
I believe they want to create a level platform at the new bench elevation.

PEInc said:
irst, analyze the existing slope using estimated soil properties to show a safety factor of 1 and then use the same properties to analyze the new, flatter slope.
Good idea. I still need to give this some thought as far as going from a phi-c soil and applying that correctly to find a K.p for the sloped condition.

PEinc said:
A tiedback wall would not be the first solution that I would investigate.
Meaning you would try using a cantilever?

PEinc said:
Will you be able to even drive sheeting that deep into soil that stiff?
That's a very good question.


EIT
 
Quote (PEinc): A tiedback wall would not be the first solution that I would investigate.

No, not a cantilevered wall. I would consider flatter sloping, maybe soil nailing, or maybe terracing several lower walls with some setback between each level.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor