gcs3pe
Structural
- Dec 3, 2010
- 22
Ahhh contractors. I was brought onto a site where a 24' long W10x88 has been installed flush in a ceiling and the contractor has taken some liberties with pipe penetrations (see attached).
A quick beam analysis shows no real issues with the selection of the beam - it's effectively uniformly loaded (deflection controls by a wide margin, shear and moment are covered in spades).
The photo shows a 3" pipe and two 1" pipes that apparently need to pass through the beam. The wood packing the web flush to the flange edge (for face mount joist hangers) has been attached with 1/2" bolts staggered at 16" on center. Unfortunately, one attachment hole is clearly in the mix with the other holes.
The holes for the pipes are 5", 2" and 1.75" in diameter, and they were created with the engineer's favorite tool - the acetylene torch. The three small holes (two pipes/one bolt) are so close that they should probably be taken as one large hole. And the torch cutting discounts what, another 1/4" of steel all around?
This condition occurs 10' from one end, so shear is relatively low at this location. The center of the large hole is above the neutral axis, and the three small holes are not far from the bottom flange. The beam has so much shear and moment capacity (525% and 100% excess, approximately), that my primary concern goes to the deflection.
Any suggestions for a decent analysis of this issue? Any down and dirty field-type solutions come to mind? This is a residential project, extremely budget sensitive, and taking that beam out will send the owners off a cliff.
A quick beam analysis shows no real issues with the selection of the beam - it's effectively uniformly loaded (deflection controls by a wide margin, shear and moment are covered in spades).
The photo shows a 3" pipe and two 1" pipes that apparently need to pass through the beam. The wood packing the web flush to the flange edge (for face mount joist hangers) has been attached with 1/2" bolts staggered at 16" on center. Unfortunately, one attachment hole is clearly in the mix with the other holes.
The holes for the pipes are 5", 2" and 1.75" in diameter, and they were created with the engineer's favorite tool - the acetylene torch. The three small holes (two pipes/one bolt) are so close that they should probably be taken as one large hole. And the torch cutting discounts what, another 1/4" of steel all around?
This condition occurs 10' from one end, so shear is relatively low at this location. The center of the large hole is above the neutral axis, and the three small holes are not far from the bottom flange. The beam has so much shear and moment capacity (525% and 100% excess, approximately), that my primary concern goes to the deflection.
Any suggestions for a decent analysis of this issue? Any down and dirty field-type solutions come to mind? This is a residential project, extremely budget sensitive, and taking that beam out will send the owners off a cliff.