Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Patran Fastener Idealization

Status
Not open for further replies.

marketto

New member
May 7, 2011
1
Hi guys,

I'm new in the forum and in using Patran&Nastran.
Sorry in advance about my english.
I was just wondering how to create a fastener between 2 rectangular plates.
I would like to create a fastener (or more) to joint the 2 plates: the nodes on 1 edge of the bottom plate will be constrained (no trasl, no rotat) and on the nodes on the opposite edge, but upper plate, will be applied the force (along the longitudinal axis of the plate).
I m able to mesh and create the surface, to apply the BC and the forces, but I have problems to idealise the fastener that join the 2 plates.
How can I simulate the fastener? Which mesh element? Do i have to create a curve between upper and lower node?
Sorry again for the english, I can explain again the problem..
Thanks
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

The first thing is to determine what the equivalent spring constant ("fastener flexibility") is. There are many formulations available.

For the FEM, the standard methods are to use either a spring element or a beam element.

Spring - Simple and direct. However, if your problem is 2D, you will need coincident springs, which require extra tracking.

Beam - Able to automatically handle 2D, but you must first calibrate the beam's inertia properties to generate the equivalent fastener flexibility. Ultimately, you are after F=kx, which can be achieved with a beam element in an indirect manner.

*If you are attaching to a shell element, there is a small amount of local deformation that affects the overall response. In theory, you should make a single fastener case and calibrate this deformation out (for both the spring or beam element approach). I have found that roughly a 20% extra increase in stiffness is needed to account for the local softening where the fastener directly attaches. This may or may not be important to your model. Also, there is quite a bit of scatter in fastener flexibility tests, so this extra bit of calibration may be in the noise (again depending on the problem).

Brian
 
Forgot to mention, you can also use a CBUSH element to represent the fastener. However, you should first become familiar with it and the various types. There are a few subtle nuances that could affect your model.

Brian
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor