rokahn
Mechanical
- Jul 5, 2002
- 48
What is the advantage of PDM/Works vs generic source control applications such as freeware RCS.
They seem to do the same thing and PDM, although it's integrated, doesn't add much by its integration. For example, in PDM/Works, one must manually refresh the status of files to find out if they're newer than the vault. And if you open a sketch in a part and exit the sketch by saving (even if you don't save the part), the file will show up as newer than the vault version.
The only advantage I've noticed is PDM/Work's visual representation of dependency of files to assemblies.
Windows integration is nice but I can get CS-RCS (a windows GUI for RCS) for $100/seat and it's integrated into windows explorer. This means we can use it for all documents around the company.
Is there something I'm missing about the benefits of PDM over std RCS?
They seem to do the same thing and PDM, although it's integrated, doesn't add much by its integration. For example, in PDM/Works, one must manually refresh the status of files to find out if they're newer than the vault. And if you open a sketch in a part and exit the sketch by saving (even if you don't save the part), the file will show up as newer than the vault version.
The only advantage I've noticed is PDM/Work's visual representation of dependency of files to assemblies.
Windows integration is nice but I can get CS-RCS (a windows GUI for RCS) for $100/seat and it's integrated into windows explorer. This means we can use it for all documents around the company.
Is there something I'm missing about the benefits of PDM over std RCS?