Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Penetration master slave surface mesh size

Status
Not open for further replies.

fisken90

Mechanical
Feb 11, 2016
6
Hi everybody!

In a contact analysis in Abaqus, you should always have a denser slave surface than master so you don't experience penetration. I found this picture to illustrate: .

I use a 4-node shell element mesh (R3D4), in contact with a solid 3d 20-node brick element. In contact it means the 20-node brick in the plane have 8 nodes against the 4-nodes in the shell elements. Do I then need to have a four times finer mesh in the shell elements then in the solid elements? If this was understandable?

Thanks for every input!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

R3D4 is a rigid element which should always be master. So I assume the hex-mesh (slave) has already more nodes on the outside and then it is ok.

Use general contact or surface-to-surface contact pairs. These formulations also reduce the mesh density issue.
 
I have found the relative stiffness of layers to be more important in many cases, so keep that in mind.

Also you may want to think about using linear bricks instead of quadratic ones for contact.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor