dppalmer
Chemical
- Jan 3, 2006
- 4
I read a good exchange on functionality and merits of DCS vs. PLC (see thread698-161284). Now that DCS functional often includes logical controls, instrumented process trips (i.e. interlocks) can be easily programmed into most DCS systems. However, as noted in referenced threads, critical trip systems are often implemented in dedicated PLC, particularly when high reliability is required (e.g. emergency shutdowns - ESD).
Is anyone aware of instrument symbology to differentiate operational interlocks that may be implemented in DCS from safety-instrumented interlocks (SIS) that must be implemented in ESD or PESS (programmable electronic safety system)? We have been using standard ISA symbology for all interlocks (using boxed hexagon)on P&IDs. However, creates ambiguity on whether trip system is SIS or an operational interlock or sequential control element. I have asked a couple of instrument engineers, but apparently there is no standard ISA symbol for differentiating a PESS from a PLC. Has anyone found a good way to do that short of labelling each symbol on the P&ID?
Is anyone aware of instrument symbology to differentiate operational interlocks that may be implemented in DCS from safety-instrumented interlocks (SIS) that must be implemented in ESD or PESS (programmable electronic safety system)? We have been using standard ISA symbology for all interlocks (using boxed hexagon)on P&IDs. However, creates ambiguity on whether trip system is SIS or an operational interlock or sequential control element. I have asked a couple of instrument engineers, but apparently there is no standard ISA symbol for differentiating a PESS from a PLC. Has anyone found a good way to do that short of labelling each symbol on the P&ID?