Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Pipe size ( (1 1/4" , 1 1/2" , 5" ) not reccomended on ANSI standard ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Luigi De Micheli

Petroleum
Jul 31, 2019
3
Dear all, in the past i seem to recall an ANSI standard wrote ( pipe size 1 1/4" , 1 1/2" , 5" ) were not reccomended. Something of us remember what is this ANSI standard ( sorry for my english) ?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

1-1/4 and 1-1/2 are not uncommon pipe sizes. I've never seen a 5" pipe used anywhere. My fitting catalog shows a 3-1/2" that I've never seen in use.
 
5" is an odd size, but we have used, mainly because our scope of work is in the (somewhat) smaller linesizes, and as such, 5" may occasionally be needed, e.g. for a control valve.
 
We make stainless tubing for people in 1 1/4 and 1 1/2 pipe sizes, likely because there isn't product out there.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, Plymouth Tube
 
If you haven't seen it recently in your work then the reason for making that recommendation probably does not apply.

A chart of ANSI pipe sizes clearly shows 5 Inch pipes in a full set of wall thicknesses, not something likely to happen if there was a reason to avoid it. Or maybe it was some very specialized application that is outside what your work entails, which is why you haven't seen it recently.

For example 4-1/2, 7, 9, and 11 inch are only listed in a small number of wall thicknesses; I would expect them to be not preferred.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor