Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Pitch Distance

Status
Not open for further replies.

istambul

Aerospace
Jun 4, 2009
10
Hello Everybody,
I would like to have the clarification on the effect of pitch distance in stress analysis. I have fitting which needs get connected through fasteners of 4.80 mm dia. The normal pitch kept is 4.5d-5.0d. In this case, due to space constraint, the pitch is 3.5d. The fasteners are shear loaded. How does it affect the stress results? Thanks in advance.

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

The net section stress (s = P/(w-d)t) is increased in the straps (w = 3.5d in your case).
 
closely pitched fasteners have an increased Kt ... 3.5d doesn't sound too bad. 4.8mm (3/32") dia rivets(?) sound pretty small for structural apps.
 
If you are working on a commercial aircraft and Part 26 is involved, you will have to do a DTA, and the foreshortened pitch will likely result in reduced cycles to failure. Also, with such a short pitch, detection of a crack may not be possible without some significant expense due to the method that would be required to detect such a small crack.
 
If it is a "fitting" and the fitting has an offset load the actual shear stress could go up per fastener due to the eccentric load acting on the closer spaced fasteners.
 
G'day Istambul
As 737eng says, changing the pitching of fasteners in a fitting can vary the load distribution between the fasteners, as well as the reactions to applied loads which may have a component parallel to, but displaced away from the mating surfaces.
Without knowing what the fitting looks like, I recommend that you consider performing a bolt group analysis (perhaps even a 3D one if necessary) using unit applied loads (in appropriate directions) to determine comparative fastener loads between the nominal and the varied configurations.
Regards
Graeme
 
Istambul,

Biggest influence is that more fasteners = more weight = less efficient. Unless you have an inter-rivet buckling issue (comp loading) or bearing-bypass 'interaction' concerns the best-practice is to revert to 5d or thereabouts.

Aerodesign
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor