handex
Structural
- Jul 1, 2010
- 56
Hey guys,
We have been forced to model a propped sheet piled wall in Wallap. The soil is composed of loose sand for the top 1.5m, with medium dense sand below (with a SPT value of 11). In wallap the user must input whether or not the soil is overconsolidated (OC) or normally consolidated (NC).
The difference between the two models is that the OC model assumes the soil has stiffness at the top, whereas the NC model assumes the soil has no stiffness at the top and varies linearly with depth.
I am looking for a way to justify that the medium dense soil which is providing lateral restraint to the toe can be modelled as OC. If its modelled as NC the results are completely unrealistic and completely in excess of what is required in reality.
Cheers
We have been forced to model a propped sheet piled wall in Wallap. The soil is composed of loose sand for the top 1.5m, with medium dense sand below (with a SPT value of 11). In wallap the user must input whether or not the soil is overconsolidated (OC) or normally consolidated (NC).
The difference between the two models is that the OC model assumes the soil has stiffness at the top, whereas the NC model assumes the soil has no stiffness at the top and varies linearly with depth.
I am looking for a way to justify that the medium dense soil which is providing lateral restraint to the toe can be modelled as OC. If its modelled as NC the results are completely unrealistic and completely in excess of what is required in reality.
Cheers