Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Pond Node Outlet Structure Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

OxEng

Civil/Environmental
May 31, 2018
1
I am reviewing a design of an underground detention system that is using 96-inch diameter storage pipe. The design engineer is modeling the control for the pond node as an 18-inch diameter culvert for the primary outlet and routing a weir plate with orifices through it. However, the plan layout has the control structure shown as a 2-foot diameter manhole located downstream of the storage pipe with 45 feet of 18-diameter pipe connecting them.

It still appropriate to model it this way or should the actual outlet from the pond node be an 18-inch diameter culvert that then connects to a catch basin node representing the control?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

As long as the weir plate is the effective control point, and the WSE remains equalized between the pipe storage and the control structure, modeling as a single pond is the recommended solution. It's easier to setup and produces more stable results than a 2-pond solution, which requires a tailwater-sensitive routing procedure because the effective outlet control for the pipe storage is in the downstream node.


Peter Smart
HydroCAD Software
 
It all goes down to how much flow that 45 ft of 18 inch pipe can convey. If it can convey the peak flow out of the facility without a significant head loss, then it's the right method. If it can't, then you've got a more complicated situation on your hands. Check the 100 year (or etc) flow from the facility in the model.

Hydrology, Drainage Analysis, Flood Studies, and Complex Stormwater Litigation for Atlanta and the South East -
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor