Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Pressure Vessel Saddle

Status
Not open for further replies.

AlexanderChacin

Mechanical
Jul 23, 2008
3
Hello everyone
I am using the attached equation to calculate the K8 factor used by the Pressure Vessel Handbook, in calculating the flexural stress at the bottom, which comes out using the attached procedure
The problem is that I have a difference between my calculation and the tabulated value
 
 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=49ba12fd-acfb-489f-9ecb-644057356108&file=Untitled.pdf
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

For theta = 120 degrees, I get K8 = 0.604 versus 0.603
For theta = 150 degrees, I get K8 = 0.877 versus 0.876
For theta = 180 degrees, I get K8 = 1.193 versus 1.183
I don't see any obvious reason for the difference.
If you're far off, make sure delta is in radians in the equation.
Fiddling with different factors in the equation tends to throw results far off.
Using 3.14 instead of 8-12 digits of pi affects results slightly, but doesn't match up to the table, either.
Similarly, adjusting the decimals used in 1/6 varies results but doesn't match the table.
I find the same tabulated numbers in an online version of Moss's book (it's K7 there). It seems odd that either would just copy something from the other, though.
 
yes, I got the same, plus the book "Pressure Vessel Design
Concepts and principles "gives the same equation for K8
 
See the original paper from ZICK.

Regards

 
It is possible the original calculations were made with a slide rule....

Regards,

Mike

The problem with sloppy work is that the supply FAR EXCEEDS the demand
 
r6155
Zick's original paper makes no mention of bending stress at bottom, nor does it determine any way to calculate an associated factor (K8 or K7, depending on the reference), which makes me think that it does not contribute significantly to the stress state in the pressure vessel, but despite this I would like to know how it is calculated and why there is a difference between authors

Mike
The lack of precision in the calculations is a possibility, but I only have significant differences in the mentioned factor K8

Regards
 

I have no more time, also you can see:

PD 5500
EN 13445-3
ASME VIII Div 2
AD-2000 Merkblatt
Process Equipment Design – Brownell Young
PV Design Handbook - Bednar

Regards
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor