chemicalengr
Chemical
- Aug 12, 2008
- 9
I'm working for a client who would like to increase the startup times of their compression trains. Currently, the trains are pressurized in stepwise manner from lowest to highest pressure, through restriction orifices installed in 2" bypass lines.
The client would like to increase the size of the restriction orifices in order to enable the pressurization to occur at a faster rate.
What are the limitations that should be imposed in a case such as this? I've calculated velocites, Mach #'s, rhov^2 and am beginning to look at Acoustic Vibration (Carucci and Mueller).
In certain cases, the results of these calculations are contradicting each other - for example the Mach # falls within the recommended range (< 0.7), but the maximum recommended velocity is exceeded (> 30 m/s). Which parameter is considered most important in designing a system of this type and is there a "Rule-of-Thumb" for how long the maximum recommended values may be exceeded?
Keep in mind that as the downstream system is pressurized, the velocity and Mach # begin to decrease.
The client would like to increase the size of the restriction orifices in order to enable the pressurization to occur at a faster rate.
What are the limitations that should be imposed in a case such as this? I've calculated velocites, Mach #'s, rhov^2 and am beginning to look at Acoustic Vibration (Carucci and Mueller).
In certain cases, the results of these calculations are contradicting each other - for example the Mach # falls within the recommended range (< 0.7), but the maximum recommended velocity is exceeded (> 30 m/s). Which parameter is considered most important in designing a system of this type and is there a "Rule-of-Thumb" for how long the maximum recommended values may be exceeded?
Keep in mind that as the downstream system is pressurized, the velocity and Mach # begin to decrease.