mgodwin
Mechanical
- Aug 30, 2005
- 3
Hello all,
I'm a very advanced UG user, but no better than a newbie in pro-e. My problem is that the company I work for uses very large amounts of vendor data (pro-e assemblies, some 15,000+ parts). I recieve the native pro-e geometry here, convert the geometry to a step 214 file, and then bring the step geometry into NX. The solids do come into NX, and seem alright visually, but after running examine geometry there are severe solid body issues, consistancy, face face intersections, spikes/cuts. These types of geometry errors result in somewhat unstable NX assemblies, and I need to try to correct the geometry that is coming out of Pro-E. I have tried heal geometry (NX), and parasolid out (Pro-E), and that made matters much worse than the step file. The shear number of files involved in the transfers makes it impractical to try to defeature the pro-e parts before export...
Thanks all for your help and suggestions,
Mark
I'm a very advanced UG user, but no better than a newbie in pro-e. My problem is that the company I work for uses very large amounts of vendor data (pro-e assemblies, some 15,000+ parts). I recieve the native pro-e geometry here, convert the geometry to a step 214 file, and then bring the step geometry into NX. The solids do come into NX, and seem alright visually, but after running examine geometry there are severe solid body issues, consistancy, face face intersections, spikes/cuts. These types of geometry errors result in somewhat unstable NX assemblies, and I need to try to correct the geometry that is coming out of Pro-E. I have tried heal geometry (NX), and parasolid out (Pro-E), and that made matters much worse than the step file. The shear number of files involved in the transfers makes it impractical to try to defeature the pro-e parts before export...
Thanks all for your help and suggestions,
Mark