Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Problem with units, Normal Modes. 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

bocchiardoje

New member
Feb 25, 2011
8
Hello, this is my first thread.
I want to calculate the normal modes of a structure.
Im working the model in millimeters [mm], the mass in kilogram [kg] for Mass elements, and the Stiffnes Modulus (E) in [daN/mm2] for material and the density in [kg/mm3]. So, the forces result in daN -> (10 N are 1daN).
I have a couple of springs in my model too and the Stiffnes in [daN/mm].
If the natural frecuencies are: Fn=(1/2*PI)*SRQT(K/M) in Hertz [Hz] or [1/seg]where K (Newton/meters) is the stiffnes of springs and M the mass in Kilogram.
Using my unit sistem (daN/mm, mm, and Kg)... My question is this: I have to multiplicate the result (Hz) in 100??? For consistence units
Only have accurate results in frecuencies when use Newton, meters and Pascal.
Sorry for my poor english! Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Hi

You can find examples of consistent units at this web page:


I have not studied your example in detail but based on the web page I doubt they are consistent. Why don't you try something simple? Be aware that Newton is kg*m/s^2 and so on.

Good Luck

Thomas
 
replace 1dN with 10N ... use consistent units
 
oh, and 1mm = 0.001m ... again, consistent units.

else if K is dN/mm, and M is kg then the consistent K = 10N/0.001m = 10^4 N/m
 
Thanks ThomasH and Rb1957. Rb1957, yes I do that, so; sqrt(10^4)=100, all my results multiplied by 100.
 
Hello!,
I you adjust your model using the following units then the normal modes results (Hz) will be OK:

• Model length in millimeters [mm].
• Mass in metric Tons [Ton] to enter mass for any lumped Mass element like "CONM2"
• Young Modulus (E) in [MPa, ie, N/mm2]
• Density in [Ton/mm3].
• Loads in Newtons, and then Stiffnes in N/mm

Using the above units scheme is very convenient to work with models in milimeters.

Best regards,
Blas.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Blas Molero Hidalgo
Ingeniero Industrial
Director

IBERISA
48011 BILBAO (SPAIN)
WEB:
 
aren't you also mixing units, using tonne for mass, not kg ?
also kN for force would be consisent

but why not use metric the way it was meant to be ... N, kg, m, sec ... who cares what the length unit is ... 1m or 1000mm looks the same on the screen
 
Yes, you can use the system of units you like, but "mm" and MPa is very convenient (the same as "mm" and "mN/mm2"), nothing to see with Pa (ie, N/m2) and "meters".

Yes, in fact, the geometry looks the same in the screen, but a pressure or stress = 100 MPa looks in the screen as 0.1e9 N/m2 .... this is the problem.

You can run the way you like, the important is to be coherent system of units.
Bst regards,
Blas.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Blas Molero Hidalgo
Ingeniero Industrial
Director

IBERISA
48011 BILBAO (SPAIN)
WEB:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor