Richard62
Chemical
- Jun 11, 2010
- 2
I am trying to validate the sizing case for an existing PRV located at the top of the column which is located downstream the depicted system (please see attached sketch).
The sizing case of the PRV is the gas blow-by through the depicted drum (an HP separator in a naphtha hydrotreating unit). In the event of level loss, the incoming gas passes through the bottom outlet and enters the column (stripper), which makes the PRV at the top of the column to open.
There is also an ESDV at the bottom exit of HP separator which is activated (closed) when the level of the drum is very low (interlock system).
However, in my oppinion, the described scenario (gas blow-by) occurs due to a double failure: fail at level control loop and also a fail of the interlock system.
In this case, shall the gas blow-by scenario be taken into account on the sizing of the PRV at the stripper column ? Is there a SIL classification of the IS which allows us not to consider this scenario ?
We appreciate any advice.
The sizing case of the PRV is the gas blow-by through the depicted drum (an HP separator in a naphtha hydrotreating unit). In the event of level loss, the incoming gas passes through the bottom outlet and enters the column (stripper), which makes the PRV at the top of the column to open.
There is also an ESDV at the bottom exit of HP separator which is activated (closed) when the level of the drum is very low (interlock system).
However, in my oppinion, the described scenario (gas blow-by) occurs due to a double failure: fail at level control loop and also a fail of the interlock system.
In this case, shall the gas blow-by scenario be taken into account on the sizing of the PRV at the stripper column ? Is there a SIL classification of the IS which allows us not to consider this scenario ?
We appreciate any advice.