nejenrod
Chemical
- Jun 18, 2010
- 9
Story line:
Vessel built 1994
Vessel diameter 7'0 ID
Top head, shell and bottom c/s 516 gr 70 (1.750"thk) with
s/s clad 304 (.125")=total=(1.875")
Steam jacket total vessel encompassed.
1st failure 2000
bottom head corroded,,,decision made to replace bottom
head with solid Inconel 625 and go to half pipe coils
just on the bottom head. Filler metal ERNICRMO-10
Process GTAW
2nd failure 2003
New Inconel head cir. weld developed through wall
cracking 45" at the toe of the Inconel weld to solid
Inconel head.
3rd failure 2010
Cir welds on bottom head two 30" through wall cracks.
Question: Previous WPS repair never called for PWHT.
Because we have three dissimilar metals with
a range of about 17% coefficient expansion
difference,,,wouldn't a PWHT in the soaking
range for Inconel help?
Vessel built 1994
Vessel diameter 7'0 ID
Top head, shell and bottom c/s 516 gr 70 (1.750"thk) with
s/s clad 304 (.125")=total=(1.875")
Steam jacket total vessel encompassed.
1st failure 2000
bottom head corroded,,,decision made to replace bottom
head with solid Inconel 625 and go to half pipe coils
just on the bottom head. Filler metal ERNICRMO-10
Process GTAW
2nd failure 2003
New Inconel head cir. weld developed through wall
cracking 45" at the toe of the Inconel weld to solid
Inconel head.
3rd failure 2010
Cir welds on bottom head two 30" through wall cracks.
Question: Previous WPS repair never called for PWHT.
Because we have three dissimilar metals with
a range of about 17% coefficient expansion
difference,,,wouldn't a PWHT in the soaking
range for Inconel help?