Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

QQ-P-35, type 11 vs QQ-P-35C, type 11

Status
Not open for further replies.

daxmann

Aerospace
Jun 16, 2015
39
Does anyone know the difference between passivate per QQ-P-35, type 11 verses passivate per QQ-P-35C, type 11? Some of the parts came in looking kind of a gray-black and others the standard silver. I have done some research and found that the specs have been updated and cancelled and updated and cancelled again but I guess I'm just needing to know if the parts are still usable. Thanks for the help.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

daxmann...

QQ-P-35A [1968] Lists Type I, II and III...
Type I Low Temperature.
Type II Medium Temperature.
Type III High Temperature
NOTE. Subsequent revisions added more roman numerals for specific passivation treatments for various SSTL [CRES] and HRA materials.

Perhaps what appears to be Type 11 is actually Type II???

I actually prefer to specify AMS2700 Method 2 - Passivation in Citric Acid ... which is applicable to virtually all SSTL/HRA metals...and is "eco-green" for storage/waste disposal.

Regards, Wil Taylor

o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true.
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible.
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion"]
o Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist. [Picasso]
 
If your PO specified QQ-P-35, type 11, which as wktaylor noted is a process that doesn't exist, where did you find a vendor to perform this work? Even though QQ-P-35 is no longer current or used for new design, there are still vendors qualified to perform the process for legacy applications. As for the difference between QQ-P-35 and QQ-P-35C, the vendor should use the latest spec revision unless otherwise instructed.

If your PO specified passivation per QQ-P-35 type II, use of this obsolete process is acceptable for your application, you have a vendor qualified to perform this process, and the vendor supplies a CoC and/or certs stating they performed the work in accordance with the standard, then you can probably go ahead and use the parts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor