birddogger
Electrical
- Feb 23, 2004
- 31
Can anyone help me in explaining the pros and cons of quartz restrike vs. pulse-start ballasts on HID lighting? The way I understand it, quartz restrike provides immediate low-level illumination during the HID's re-lamping period following a power outage via a separate quartz filament, while pulse-start ballasts essentially "shock" the HID lamp such that it re-lamps much quicker.
I would think that quartz restrike would be cheaper, more reliable, and would achieve the desired goal (immediate light) quicker than pulse-starts, which seem to be bulkier, more expensive, yield shorter lamp life, and still don't produce sufficient light as quickly as the quartz restrike. Don't pulse starts still take a matter of minutes to reach full illumination?
Thanks in advance!
I would think that quartz restrike would be cheaper, more reliable, and would achieve the desired goal (immediate light) quicker than pulse-starts, which seem to be bulkier, more expensive, yield shorter lamp life, and still don't produce sufficient light as quickly as the quartz restrike. Don't pulse starts still take a matter of minutes to reach full illumination?
Thanks in advance!