Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Racked two story 1890 balloon frame 1

StrucPatholgst

Structural
Jan 23, 2013
156
The Scenario:
Tiny 1890's balloon frame, narrow floor plan (11' wide, 32' deep) with a shallow 7 foot 'L' leg at the rear (so if I type the letter 'L', the street is at the top of the L). Racking damage (leaning to the side of the 'L' to the right), likely from the Great Atlantic hurricane in '44. Top of foundation is level all around perimeter, and in good condition. Sill beam in excellent condition. Floors generally level, save for 3/4" age-related wood creep. Home apparently received a full gut and exterior reno in the 80's that completely concealed the racking. Current owner started a full gut reno, and revealed it all over again. Original racking is on the order of 6 inches over the full two story height. All of the current doors and windows are plumb (windows have 2004 date code). 1980's era drywall at left and right facades is out of plumb 3/4" over heights of rooms at both stories. Owner wants to remove one wall between kitchen and front room. Secondary issue of ridiculous ad hoc stud patterns at second floor right side wall, where the builder used up all of his shorts to complete the framing to the top of the second floor (real clown act).

The Game Plan:
Easier to install full shear panels at front and rear facades than to break it up, so that's what's going in. Panels also going in at street side of 'L' bump out (both floors), and at the stairwell short walls on floors 1 and 2 and the basement. Installing continuous 2x lumber to simulate a rim joist at each of these walls, screwed to the studs above the drywall line, and doubling up corner studs through the transitions between floors with LVL studs. Installing straps every 8 feet from first floor studs down to interior face of foundation (no sill anchors to speak of). Reinforcing the section of ad hoc 'shorts' framing at second floor with new sister studs.

This was an interesting exercise, because the floor plan is so small that it was a waste of labor to fab shear wall panels to the minimum requirement, as opposed to just installing full sheets and calling it a day.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

That's quite a job for such a small building - is it listed, or otherwise considered historically important? Or is it a zoning issue that wouldn't allow it to be rebuilt?

Post some pictures!
 
Not seeing a question, here. Just a lot of author bias.

"Secondary issue of ridiculous ad hoc stud patterns at second floor right side wall, where the builder used up all of his shorts to complete the framing to the top of the second floor (real clown act)."

This was pretty standard practice at the time, and it stood for how many years before your Ph.D landed on the job?
 
Not seeing a question, here. Just a lot of author bias.

"Secondary issue of ridiculous ad hoc stud patterns at second floor right side wall, where the builder used up all of his shorts to complete the framing to the top of the second floor (real clown act)."

This was pretty standard practice at the time, and it stood for how many years before your Ph.D landed on the job?
I didn't pose a question. Regarding your question, the home is 135 years old, leaning 6 inches to the left, and I don't have a PHD.
 
So are they going undo the racking? how?
No plans to unrack. Owner was given the option of stabilizing what he had, or gutting the interior/exterior and bringing the building back plumb. We were called in after he got a price for a tear down, and a price for gutting and re-plumbing.
That's quite a job for such a small building - is it listed, or otherwise considered historically important? Or is it a zoning issue that wouldn't allow it to be rebuilt?

Post some pictures!
Block is zoned Light Industrial, but each of the residential homes on the block are grandfathered in as non-complaint but approved uses. Local zoning board stated a tear-down and new residential structure would require a variance.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7203.JPEG
    IMG_7203.JPEG
    459.5 KB · Views: 8
  • IMG_7215.JPEG
    IMG_7215.JPEG
    812.1 KB · Views: 8
Just a lot of author bias.
I see you've started reading your posts! I kid - but who cares? OP wanted to post about a project they're working on that others might (and, indeed, are) interested in. Not everything has to be a question.
it stood for how many years
Did you get hit on the head? I'm quite certain I could go back and find a bunch of posts from you deriding this mentality. I won't, because I don't care enough, but I'm pretty sure I could.
Block is zoned Light Industrial, but each of the residential homes on the block are grandfathered in as non-complaint but approved uses. Local zoning board stated a tear-down and new residential structure would require a variance.
Gets weirder and weirder...the money spent on a job like this seems like a lot for a homeowner in a small house in an industrial part of town or an investor fixing up a rental property. But hey - there's a lot that goes into decisions like this and I can't know all the variables.
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor