Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Radiography

Status
Not open for further replies.

darrenyee88

Mechanical
Jul 17, 2014
56
Can I know what is the difference between Full radiography and 100% radiography?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

They are one in the same.

Full radiography, Per ASME Section VIII, Div 1 (UW-11 and 12)is the more common term.
 
Oh i see. I was told by that for full radiography is only for butt weld that exceed certain thickness. However for 100%, means all the butt weld need to be radiograph no matter what is the thickness . I read UW-11 and 12 but 100% was no mention. so i am abit lost .
 
Sorry, but they are NOT the same. Under ASME "Full Radiography" usually entails 100% of all longitudinal seams and all long. to circumferential seam junctions; BUT only requires 'spot RT' of the circ. seams. And all of these seams are full-penn butt welds. See VIII Div-1 QW-51.

And "100% RT" adds 100% of the circ. welds, versus the 'spot RT' of "Full RT".
 
For Sec VIII, Div 1 work 100% RT is generally taken to mean that the exemptions of UW-11(a)(4) for Cat B & C welds are not taken, these are RT'd. This can vary by organization however. Best to ask the question.


Rgards,

Mike
 
I agree with Duwe6,
Both Full and 100% (and Spot) are noted in ASME VIII whereas the B31 piping codes reference 100%, Random or Spot radiography,
Cheers,
DD
 
DekDee, I think it goes a little bit beyond that. The difference you mention is between RT-1 and RT-2. Following is my interpretation.

Full Radiography

ASME VIII-1 has two meanings for full radiography:
[ol 1]
[li]RT-1: Full radiography of all long and all circ seams, but with some exceptions (eg: nozzles and communicating chambers not larger than NPS10)[/li]
[li]RT-2: Full radiography of all long seams, but spot radiography on circ seams, but with the same exceptions above (eg: nozzles and communicating chambers not larger than NPS10)[/li]
[/ol]

So, it can be called full radiography in either case, but you are still leaving out some welds (small nozzles for example)

100% Radiography
Some customers for some applications require absolutely every butt weld to be radiographed, not allowing for any of the exceptions allowed by ASME VIII-1 for full radiography. For 100% radiography I would be performing radiography even on those little NPS2 pipe to RFWN nozzle welds.


Just my opinion... I'm sure others read this differently. Normally when I see 100%, I confirm whether they actually meant full radiography as defined by ASME as either RT-1 or RT-2. If they actually mean 100%, they'll reiterate it.

Marty
 
marty,
I have mentioned no differences - just agreed with Duwe6.
The most basic answer to the OP is if "Full" radiography is required everything noted in UW 11 must be radiographed.
If 100% radiography is required all butt welds nominated for "spot" radiography must be radiographed 100%.
If nozzles are not nominated for any radiography at all I can see nothing in ASME VIII requiring it.
The only reference I can find to 100% radiography is in UW-52 Spot Radiography,
Regards,
DD
 
100% RT and full RT are the same terms. how it is applied and required by Code or to customer's specifications or requirements are different cases.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor