philus
Mechanical
- Apr 14, 2015
- 1
Hi all,
I have some doubt about the Rayleigh number: when it is computed in case of a constant wall temperature it is in the form
Ra=g*beta/(nu*alpha)*(Tw-Tinf)L^3
while in case of a constant heat flux it is
Ra*=g*beta/(nu*alpha)*q/k*L^4
But if I suppose only convective the heat exchange I can say that q=h*(Tw-Tinf), then
Ra*=g*beta/(nu*alpha)*h*(Tw-Tinf)/k*L^4 = g*beta/(nu*alpha)*(Tw-Tinf)L^3 * h*L/k = Ra * Nu
I should then conclude that the Rayleigh number is completly another thing respect the modified Rayleigh number? They are not comparable?
I have to simulate the heat exchange of a real tube, I am neither in the case of a constant wall temperature, nor in the case of a constant wall heat flux. I have found a good correlation for my case (Misumi 2003) and they use the modified Rayleigh number. Should I absolutely use the modified form? Because I have a difference of order 100 (the Nusselt) and the flow is just transitory...
Can anyone help me in that?
Thanks in advance
philus
I have some doubt about the Rayleigh number: when it is computed in case of a constant wall temperature it is in the form
Ra=g*beta/(nu*alpha)*(Tw-Tinf)L^3
while in case of a constant heat flux it is
Ra*=g*beta/(nu*alpha)*q/k*L^4
But if I suppose only convective the heat exchange I can say that q=h*(Tw-Tinf), then
Ra*=g*beta/(nu*alpha)*h*(Tw-Tinf)/k*L^4 = g*beta/(nu*alpha)*(Tw-Tinf)L^3 * h*L/k = Ra * Nu
I should then conclude that the Rayleigh number is completly another thing respect the modified Rayleigh number? They are not comparable?
I have to simulate the heat exchange of a real tube, I am neither in the case of a constant wall temperature, nor in the case of a constant wall heat flux. I have found a good correlation for my case (Misumi 2003) and they use the modified Rayleigh number. Should I absolutely use the modified form? Because I have a difference of order 100 (the Nusselt) and the flow is just transitory...
Can anyone help me in that?
Thanks in advance
philus