I have a question about reactive power compensators (Static VAR Compensator, Static STATCOM, and Dynamic Synchronous Condenser). Are all of these used to improve the voltage drop at the receiving end of transmission line? Also, do they provide capacitive-compensation or inductive-compensation, or a combination of both? Thanks.
Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Reactive Power Compensators 1
- Thread starter timm33333
- Start date
-
1
- #2
Essentially, yes, and compensation either singly or by both in combination can & have been used, although switching nuances viz. step/incremental change versus smooth/stepless or a combination will be chosen depending upon the condition or conditions being addressed.
Update via Edit function: According to material from ABB, reactor flows lend themselves to being controlled smoothly and steplessly, while individual groups of capacitor cans are switched in and out of service incrementally / in steps as conditions require.
If I'm grasping it correctly, the high-speed reactor control circuitry can be set up to anticipate the steps that are incurred when capacitors are switched, such that the jumps and steps to reactive flows all occur within the unit, while the combined output of the capacitors and reactors as seen from the outside is / can be very smooth.
The difference is noticeable; my utility uses some units that consist of switched caps only, and the incremental output of these units in response to system voltage changes is very evident. The smoothness of the output of the combined type is also very conspicuous, or perhaps it is better to say conspicuous by its absence of disturbance; one of ours in particular can be anywhere on a continuum from absorbing ~40 MX to producing ~60 MX.
You clearly get what you pay for.
Update via Edit function: According to material from ABB, reactor flows lend themselves to being controlled smoothly and steplessly, while individual groups of capacitor cans are switched in and out of service incrementally / in steps as conditions require.
If I'm grasping it correctly, the high-speed reactor control circuitry can be set up to anticipate the steps that are incurred when capacitors are switched, such that the jumps and steps to reactive flows all occur within the unit, while the combined output of the capacitors and reactors as seen from the outside is / can be very smooth.
The difference is noticeable; my utility uses some units that consist of switched caps only, and the incremental output of these units in response to system voltage changes is very evident. The smoothness of the output of the combined type is also very conspicuous, or perhaps it is better to say conspicuous by its absence of disturbance; one of ours in particular can be anywhere on a continuum from absorbing ~40 MX to producing ~60 MX.
You clearly get what you pay for.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Question