Wloria
Electrical
- Aug 10, 2014
- 2
Hi All,
I am building a power plant reactive power calculator to determine what the reactive power at the point of interconnection would be. I have read other threads on this topic and I wanted to confirm my answers.
Coming off a MV Xfmer we have 34.5 kV. The data that I gathered from several underground xple cable manufactures says that a typical capacitance and inductance for the size cable (~700MCM) would be in the ball park of 0.300 uF/km and 0.3mH/km. For a short run of 5-16 miles, and transmitting between 10-80 MVA, my quick math tells me that the line would be very capacitive, almost to the point where I could neglect the inductance. The two port pi model calculations also show that the receiving end voltage and current would be higher which indicate the same thing.
For the quick math I used: Qc=(V^2/1.732)*2*pi*60*C*length
and Ql=I^2*2*pi*60*L*length
So, my question: Does this seem correct for underground cables in a trefoil configuration buried in a duct? Does the capacitance increase so much that the overall characteristic would be capacitive? I know it depends on the architecture of the cabling but even using the worse case scenario of 1 long line that carries all the amperage I find capcitive qualities. I am so used to lines being inductive that, I just wanted to run this by people who have hands-on experience and/or deal with these types of calculations every day.
Any feedback is greatly appreciated!
I am building a power plant reactive power calculator to determine what the reactive power at the point of interconnection would be. I have read other threads on this topic and I wanted to confirm my answers.
Coming off a MV Xfmer we have 34.5 kV. The data that I gathered from several underground xple cable manufactures says that a typical capacitance and inductance for the size cable (~700MCM) would be in the ball park of 0.300 uF/km and 0.3mH/km. For a short run of 5-16 miles, and transmitting between 10-80 MVA, my quick math tells me that the line would be very capacitive, almost to the point where I could neglect the inductance. The two port pi model calculations also show that the receiving end voltage and current would be higher which indicate the same thing.
For the quick math I used: Qc=(V^2/1.732)*2*pi*60*C*length
and Ql=I^2*2*pi*60*L*length
So, my question: Does this seem correct for underground cables in a trefoil configuration buried in a duct? Does the capacitance increase so much that the overall characteristic would be capacitive? I know it depends on the architecture of the cabling but even using the worse case scenario of 1 long line that carries all the amperage I find capcitive qualities. I am so used to lines being inductive that, I just wanted to run this by people who have hands-on experience and/or deal with these types of calculations every day.
Any feedback is greatly appreciated!