Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Regarding Maximum allowable stress & Design Stress Intensity

Status
Not open for further replies.

aa1122

Petroleum
Mar 22, 2017
1
I have a query regarding Maximum allowable stress values , S , (From Table 1A) and Design stress intensity, Sm , (From Table 2A).

For A106 Gr B (-20 to 100)---- Design stress intensity= 20.0 Ksi
For A106 Gr B (-20 to 100)---- Maximum allowable stress values , S = 17.1 Ksi

My doubt is why this difference is coming?

I understand that 1A is based on : Maximum Principal stress Failure Theory
I understand that 2A is based on : Maximum Shear stress Failure Theory

Now as per Maximum Principal stress Failure Theory(Rankine Theory)---Plastic deformation occurs in a 3-Dimensional stress state whenever the Maximum Principal stress exceeds Syield.

And

As per Maximum Shear stress Failure Theory(Tresca Theory)---Plastic deformation occurs in a 3-Dimensional stress state whenever the Maximum Shear stress exceeds Syield/2.


But how we can find the clue about difference in Design stress intensity & Maximum allowable stress values?

Kindly share your opinion.

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

The difference comes about because of the different design basis, as described in II-D Appendix 1 and 2. Don't over think this - it's a matter of design margin.

The issue that you present has some merit as a controversy in VIII-2, because the fundamental formula for calculating wall thickness is based on maximum principal stress, yet combined loading is based on von Mises.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor