Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

RELATIVE COMPACTION ON FDT

Status
Not open for further replies.

saiya

Geotechnical
Dec 15, 2011
4
We are testing for compaction lahar (volcanic ash) using field density test.

MDD = 1.67 gm/cc
OMC = 13.77%

We had results giving 148% compaction!
Resulting to a in-situ dry density of 2.46gm/cc
(AS HARD AS CONCRETE!)

Obviously, something is wrong already.

CAN YOU PLEASE ADVISE A MAXIMUM CRITERIA OF ACCEPTANCE FOR RELATIVE COMPACTION?
Does 115% sound reasonable?

Thanks!


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I typically start looking at the Moisture-Density relationship being out of range if the relative compaction exceeds about 105%.

Run a moisture-density relationship on a couple of specimens and see if they plot on the original curve. If not, you have a material change and need to do a new Moisture-Density relationship curve.
 
We also had problems with the base coarse material.

MDD: 2.27 gm/cc
OMC: 8.30%

Specific Gravity = 2.98

CAN YOU RECOMMEND A CUT OFF TOO?

NOTE: STANDARD PROCTOR TEST was used to get the MDD and OMC.
 
The standard Proctor could be the problem. In granular materials, the compactive effort put forth by modern compaction equipment can easily exceed the standard Proctor effort.

If you are using vibratory compaction equipment and your material has less than 10 or 15 percent fines, I would use the Modified Proctor.
 
Is this sort of volcanic ash prone to particle breakdown during compaction?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor