Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Removing the secondary units tolerence in NX Drafting

Status
Not open for further replies.

ingallspw

Mechanical
Mar 17, 2009
178
To the Quick:

1. I want to be able to shut off the metric tolerancing and simply put the metric numeric value for reference but leave the English tolerance.

2. Is there anyway to have NX convert the rounded value directly to Metric instead of using the more accurate value it took from the model?

3. I'm also open to suggestions and best practices.



Background Info:

This past week I've been getting hit up by our German counterparts. In NX we are using Dual Dimensioning where English is primary.

I'll start with the secondary issue. They've noticed that the English and metric are not rounding to be the clean 25.4" as they expect. eg: 1.35 = [34.2] as apposed to in NX 1.35 = [34.3] by using a calculator. I understand NX is taking the actual value and rounding that (as it should). I really don't know what to tell them about this other than we may start using 3 decimal places on both... i don't know. So... To make people happy... Is there anyway to have NX convert the rounded value directly to Metric instead of using the more accurate value it took from the model?

The issue that bothers me the most is that our plant still uses English (Please don't shoot me... its not something that is going to change soon and I don't want to argue that point.) So everything we have is tooled in English and gets bought off using English. However, in certain cases, the metric value actually comes out tighter. eg: +/- 0.06" = [1.5] reversed however [1.5] = 0.591. Splitting hairs? Yeah. But people love to split hairs. Can't change that either. I want to be able to shut off the metric tolerancing and simply put the metric numeric value for reference. (probably violates ANSI Y1484.536ZZZ 2055)

I'm also open to suggestions and best practices.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

If it violates the 'standards' then there's probably no built-in means to do this.

John R. Baker, P.E.
Product 'Evangelist'
Product Engineering Software
Siemens PLM Software Inc.
Industry Sector
Cypress, CA
UG/NX Museum:
To an Engineer, the glass is twice as big as it needs to be.
 
We follow the standards and let the system round things off as it wants to. :)
Then we tell management that the system is working as designed and we need to adjust our attitude to let the system work for us instead of fighting it. If we have to change procedures, then we will document why and what impact is involved, make the change and move on.

When I started at one company many years ago, they used metric dimensioning with trailing zeros. At the time they started, UG did not have a setting for that. When I set up the new version and turned on suppress trailing zeros, it caused all sorts of trouble. Tolerances now had to be exlicitly called out since the title block defaults changed things. We held a meeting, explained to engineering and manufacturing what happened and why and then agreed to change all revised drawings going forward. Our drawings had a notation on them saying that the drawing was done in accordance with ASME Y14.5-1982 (at that time).



"Wildfires are dangerous, hard to control, and economically catastrophic."

Ben Loosli
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor