ArmoredSpecialtyCars
Mechanical
- Mar 25, 2015
- 7
Hello,
I recently got a some parts scanned using a handy Handyscan700. I am now chosing which level of post processing is best for my purposes but am having difficulty. They provided two samples, one is done with reverse engineering and one is done with auto surfacing. I am having trouble deciphering which one is more accurate and cost effective.
I imagine the reverse engineering is more time consuming because it is more manual work using best fit lines. It looks much cleaner than the auto surface but if it is less accurate and more expensive, why would I ever choose it over the auto surface?
My needs are to be able to make fixtures, jigs, and steel plates that follow the curves. Accuracy to +/- 1mm is ideal.
I attached a photo with both samples inserted, reverse engineering on the left and auto surfacing on the right.
What do you think?
Thank you
I recently got a some parts scanned using a handy Handyscan700. I am now chosing which level of post processing is best for my purposes but am having difficulty. They provided two samples, one is done with reverse engineering and one is done with auto surfacing. I am having trouble deciphering which one is more accurate and cost effective.
I imagine the reverse engineering is more time consuming because it is more manual work using best fit lines. It looks much cleaner than the auto surface but if it is less accurate and more expensive, why would I ever choose it over the auto surface?
My needs are to be able to make fixtures, jigs, and steel plates that follow the curves. Accuracy to +/- 1mm is ideal.
I attached a photo with both samples inserted, reverse engineering on the left and auto surfacing on the right.
What do you think?
Thank you